A Competency Framework for AI Literacy
Variations by Different Learner Groups and an Implied Learning Pathway
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21297571 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Hyunkyung Chee (0009-0001-7630-8824, Center for Teaching and Learning Kyung Hee University Seoul Republic of Korea), Solmoe Ahn (0000-0002-7764-4651, Dental Research Institute Seoul National University Seoul Republic of Korea), Jihyun Lee (0000-0001-9357-5345, Department of Dental Education, School of Dentistry & Dental Research Institute Seoul National University Seoul Republic of Korea, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 56 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 2146-2182 |
| Publication date | 2025-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | British Journal of Educational Technology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0007-1013 • E-ISSN: 1467-8535 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/bjet.13556 |
| OpenAlex | W4405854414 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 28 |
| References cited | 62 |
This study aims to develop a comprehensive competency framework for artificial intelligence (AI) literacy, delineating essential competencies and sub‐competencies. This framework and its potential variations, tailored to different learner groups (by educational level and discipline), can serve as a crucial reference for designing and implementing AI curricula. However, the research on AI literacy by target learners is still in its infancy, and the findings of several existing studies provide inconsistent guidelines for educational practices. Following the 2020 PRISMA guidelines, we searched the Web of Science, Scopus, and ScienceDirect databases to identify relevant studies published between January 2012 and October 2024. The quality of the included studies was evaluated using QualSyst. A total of 29 studies were identified, and their research findings were synthesized. Results show that at the K‐12 level, the required competencies include basic AI knowledge, device usage, and AI ethics. For higher education, the focus shifts to understanding data and algorithms, problem‐solving, and career‐related competencies. For general workforce, emphasis is placed on the interpretation and utilization of data and AI tools for specific careers, along with error detection and AI‐based decision‐making. This study connects the progression of specific learning objectives, which should be intensively addressed at each stage, to propose an AI literacy education pathway. We discuss the findings, potentials, and limitations of the derived competency framework for AI literacy, including its theoretical and practical implications and future research suggestions. Practitioner notes What is already known about this topic AI literacy is becoming increasingly important as AI technologies are integrated into various aspects of life and work. Research on AI literacy competencies across diverse learner groups and disciplines remains fragmented and inconsistent to guide educational practices. Studies providing a coherent pathway for AI literacy development throughout educational and working life are lacking. What this paper adds A comprehensive AI literacy competency framework consisting of 8 competencies and 18 sub‐competencies. Variations in AI literacy competencies with tailored configuration and prioritization across different learner groups by school levels and disciplines. A proposed pathway for developing AI literacy from K‐12 to higher education and workforce levels. Implications for practice and policy The framework can guide the design and implementation of AI curricula tailored to different learner characteristics and needs. Education should shift focus from teaching how to use AI to fostering competencies for critical, strategic, responsible and ethical integration of AI. Policies are needed to support a systematic pathway for lifelong AI literacy development from K‐12 education to workforce training
Literacy · Mathematics education · Pedagogy · Computer Science · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · Online Learning and Analytics · Psychology · Teaching and Learning Programming
Students′ Voices on Artificial Intelligence
AI awareness and technical competency levels among arts and science college teachers in Kerala
Students’ demand for AI literacy training in collaboration with teaching staff
Theoretical and methodological foundations of a hierarchical model of meta-digital competence for interaction with generative language models
AI in rural classrooms
Artificial intelligence self-efficacy and attitudes among nursing students
Validation of the University of Florida AI Literacy Model for IT Skill Development in Saudi Higher Education
Validating and refining a multi-dimensional scale for measuring AI literacy in education using the Rasch Model
Assessing artificial intelligence literacy in foreign language teachers
The Pseudo-Confidence Paradox
AI and algorithmic literacy among health workers
Toward a Coherent AI Literacy Pathway in Technology Education
Ethical Problems in the Use of Artificial Intelligence by University Educators
Analysis of AI-Readiness of University Students Using AI-Competency Measurement Framework
Metacognitive AI literacy
A systematic review of how educators integrate ethics into artificial intelligence curriculum
Black Girls’ Development of Sociocritical AI Literacies Through Critique and Design
Bridging AI chatbot use and critical thinking
Unveiling AI literacy in K-12 education
Enhancing the quality of educators’ AI competency
Teachers’ digital intelligence learning competence (TDILC)
Development and evaluation of artificial intelligence literacy training for teacher education students
Children's Conceptions of AI , Ethics and Intelligence in China
NLP ‐enabled automated assessment of scientific explanations
Algorithmic Transparency and Citizen Trust in Digital Governance
Artificial Intelligence Literacy and Sustainable Development
What Does AI Literacy Mean in L2 Writing? A Mixed‐Methods Investigation of Chinese EFL Student Writers’ AI Literacy Profiles and Their Links With Writing Self‐Regulated Learning Strategies
Can ChatGPT enhance business student creativity? Evidence from a randomised controlled trial
The origins of intelligence in children.
What is AI Literacy? Competencies and Design Considerations
Artificial intelligence literacy in higher and adult education
Integrating Ethics and Career Futures with Technical Learning to Promote AI Literacy for Middle School Students
Artificial Intelligence (AI) Literacy in Early Childhood Education
Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence
A systematic review of AI literacy conceptualization, constructs, and implementation and assessment efforts (2019–2023)
AI literacy in K-12
From human writing to artificial intelligence generated text
Developing a model for AI Across the curriculum
Conceptualizing AI literacy
Sustainable Curriculum Planning for Artificial Intelligence Education
What are artificial intelligence literacy and competency? A comprehensive framework to support them
Developing AI Literacy for Primary and Middle School Teachers in China
Education in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI)
The PRISMA 2020 statement
The future of employment
Information and Media Literacy in the Age of AI
Artificial intelligence (AI) literacy education in secondary schools
Reimagining Medical Education in the Age of AI
Using ChatGPT in academic writing is (not) a form of plagiarism
Development and Validation of an Algorithm Literacy Scale for Internet Users
Are We Dupes? Limitations of AI Systems
Andragogy in Action
Understanding media
Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation
| Unique citing works | 28 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 28 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 28 |