Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

A systematic review of online persistent learning

Methodologies, findings and issues

Bibliographic Data

ID21297777
AuthorsGaojun Shi (0000-0003-2457-2209, College of Education Zhejiang University Hangzhou China), Yan Li (0000-0001-6650-7726, College of Education Zhejiang University Hangzhou China), Rustam Shadiev (0000-0001-5571-1158, College of Education Zhejiang University Hangzhou China, corresponding author)
Year2026
Volume57
Issue2
Pages395-422
Publication date2026-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueBritish Journal of Educational Technology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0007-1013 • E-ISSN: 1467-8535
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/bjet.70036
OpenAlexW4417422738
LanguageEN
References cited74

Online persistent learning is a significant and growing field of study. Despite the numerous published studies on this topic, there is a notable lack of comprehensive reviews that analyse these studies, particularly in terms of their methodologies, findings and the issues reported by researchers. This study aims to systematically review twenty‐seven papers on online persistent learning, evaluating them across nine dimensions. It offers a synthesized conceptualization of OPL that clarifies its scope, variability and core components and identifies key patterns related to learning environments, research designs, pedagogical strategies and technological applications. The results show that most studies focus on higher education students, employ short‐ to medium‐term course durations and rely heavily on quantitative methods such as log data analysis. Assessment, engagement, interaction and discussion are frequent strategies to support online persistent learning, whereas the use of tools remains limited. Based on these results, this study highlights two key gaps. First, AI‐supported learning activities remain limited, making it challenging to sustain learner persistence. Second, there is a lack of mixed‐method and longitudinal research designs necessary to examine the dynamic nature of OPL. For researchers, this underscores the need for more integrative and longitudinal investigations to capture the nuanced processes underlying persistence. For practitioners, the findings suggest that persistence is not merely a function of platform or content design but is closely tied to how learning activities are supported and personalized. Practitioner notes What is already known about this topic Persistence is an important characteristic for online learning, as it effectively enhances the efficiency of online learning. Existing studies have explored the factors affecting online persistent learning, and some reviews have comprehensively analysed these factors. Previous reviews focus only on category factors, yet more important details involved in online persistent learning, such as learning activities, are often overlooked. What this paper adds More granular evidence is added to explore the factors affecting online persistent learning, such as duration and time unit. Support strategy, learning activity and tools are included in the coding to examine their effectiveness on online persistent learning. Issues with online persistent learning reported in existing studies are identified, such as the inability to maintain persistence, the inability to predict persistence and the inability to assess persistence. Implications for practice and/or policy Despite being a widely focused topic, some gaps in online persistent learning still need to be addressed, such as the lack of investigations on micro‐persistence. Nine key dimensions of online persistent learning are identified for future study to offer valuable insights for researchers and educators. It is essential for future research to expand the range of research variables and to collect longitudinal mixed data to better understand online persistent learning

Conceptualization · Educational technology · Field (mathematics) · Focus (optics) · Function (biology) · Key (lock) · Longitudinal data · Online learning · Persistence (discontinuity) · Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods · Innovative Teaching Methods · Online Learning and Analytics

  • A review of online course dropout research

    Open Access•Youngju Lee, Jaeho Choi•Educational Technology Research…•2011

  • Researching the community of inquiry framework

    Open Access•D Randy Garrison, J B Arbaugh•The Internet and Higher Education•2007

  • Engagement in language learning

    Open Access•Phil Hiver, Ali H Al‐hoorie et al.•Language Teaching Research•2024

  • What is user engagement? A conceptual framework for defining user engagement with technology

    Open Access•Heather L O'Brien, Elaine G Toms•Journal of the Association for…•2008

  • Understanding the Moocs continuance

    Open Access•Khaled M Alraimi, Hangjung Zo et al.•Computers & Education•2015

  • Learning Engagement and Persistence in Massive Open Online Courses (Moocs)

    Open Access•Yeonji Jung, Jeongmin Lee•Computers & Education•2018

  • How true is grit? Assessing its relations to high school and college students’ personality characteristics, self-regulation, engagement, and achievement.

    Open Access•Katherine Muenks, Allan Wigfield et al.•Journal of Educational Psychology•2017

  • High tech, high touch

    Open Access•Julie Edmunds, Dora Gicheva et al.•The Internet and Higher Education•2021

  • Comparing learning persistence and engagement in asynchronous and synchronous online learning, the role of autonomous academic motivation and time management

    Hang Zeng, Yuanyuan Xin•Interactive Learning Environments•2025

  • Automatic text generation using deep learning

    Hanxiang Du, Wanli Xing et al.•Interactive Learning Environments•2023

  • Examining factors influencing e-learning engagement among university students during covid-19 pandemic

    Ibrahim Adeshola, Mary Agoyi•Interactive Learning Environments•2023

  • Prediction of students’ early dropout based on their interaction logs in online learning environment

    Ahmed Ali Mubarak, Han Cao et al.•Interactive Learning Environments•2022

  • A study on the influencing factors of university students’ online persistent learning supported by intelligent technology in the post-pandemic era

    Gaojun Shi, Jiaping Li et al.•Interactive Learning Environments•2024

  • Teachers’ agency and online education in times of crisis

    Open Access•Crina Damşa, Malcolm Langford et al.•Computers in Human Behavior•2021

  • Beyond one-size-fits-all in Moocs

    Open Access•Saman Rizvi, Bart Rienties et al.•Computers in Human Behavior•2022

  • Taking action to reduce dropout in Moocs

    Open Access•Inma Borrella, Sergio Caballero-Caballero et al.•Computers & Education•2022

  • Computational thinking and assignment resubmission predict persistence in a computer science Mooc

    Open Access•Chen Chen, Gerhard Sonnert et al.•Journal of Computer Assisted…•2020

  • Micro‐persistence and difficulty in a game‐based learning environment for computational thinking acquisition

    Open Access•Rotem Israel‐Fishelson, Arnon Hershkovitz•Journal of Computer Assisted…•2021

  • Motives for dropping out from higher education—An analysis of bachelor's degree students in Germany

    Open Access•Andreas Behr, Marco Giese et al.•European Journal of Education•2021

  • Effects of AI Affordances on Student Engagement in EFL Classrooms

    Open Access•Jinfen Xu, Juan Li•European Journal of Education•2024

  • High-stake student drop-out prediction using hidden Markov models in fully asynchronous subscription-based Moocs

    Open Access•Dries F Benoit, Wai Kit Tsang et al.•Technological Forecasting and…•2024

  • Persistence, performance, and goal setting in massive open online courses

    Open Access•Kun Li, Justin Johnsen et al.•British Journal of Educational…•2021

  • The affordances of AI‐enabled automatic scoring applications on learners’ continuous learning intention

    Open Access•Shixuan Fu, Huimin Gu et al.•British Journal of Educational…•2020

  • Large qualitative sample and thematic analysis to redefine student dropout and retention strategy in open online education

    Open Access•Steven J Greenland, Catherine Moore•British Journal of Educational…•2022

  • Formative assessment as practice

    Martijn J M Leenknecht, Lieke Wijnia et al.•Assessment & Evaluation in Higher…•2021

  • The impact of an online stress intervention on burnout and teacher efficacy

    Open Access•Brandis Ansley, Brandis M Ansley et al.•Teaching and Teacher Education•2020

  • Challenges of the supervision process in the teacher education practicum – A qualitative research review

    Open Access•Cato Bjørndal, Petter Mathisen et al.•Teaching and Teacher Education•2024

  • In School, Engaged, on Track? The Effect of the Pandemic on Student Attendance, Course Grades, and Grade Retention in North Carolina

    Open Access•Sarah C Fuller, Tom Swiderski et al.•Educational Researcher•2025

  • Persistence Patterns in Massive Open Online Courses (Moocs)

    Brent J Evans, Rachel Baker et al.•The Journal of Higher Education•2016

  • Predictors of Retention and Achievement in a Massive Open Online Course

    Open Access•Jeffrey A Greene, C Oswald et al.•American Educational Research…•2015

  • Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner

    Barry J Zimmerman•Theory Into Practice•2002

  • Choose wisely

    Laura Aglaia Sophia Messerer, Karina Karst et al.•Studies in Higher Education•2023

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae