Expressive suppression strengthens coherence between arousal intensity and arousal interpretation
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21297969 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Katherine Knauft (0000-0002-4017-6647, Department of Psychology and Neuroscience Baylor University Waco Texas USA, corresponding author), Alexandra T Tyra (0000-0003-2444-0265, Department of Psychology and Neuroscience Baylor University Waco Texas USA), Thomas A Fergus (0000-0002-1675-2974, Department of Psychology and Neuroscience Baylor University Waco Texas USA), Savaughn E Williams (0000-0003-4142-0813, University of Birmingham), Sarah E Williams (0000-0002-1745-2498, School of Sport, Exercise, and Rehabilitation Sciences University of Birmingham Birmingham UK), Annie T Ginty (0000-0002-6817-4336, Department of Psychology and Neuroscience Baylor University Waco Texas USA) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Publication date | 2026-02-04 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | British Journal of Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0007-1269 • E-ISSN: 2044-8295 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/bjop.70062 |
| PMID | 41636096 |
| OpenAlex | W7127583463 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 46 |
Interpretations of physiological arousal may be a key pathway connecting stress‐related physiological arousal intensity to physiological and affective consequences of stress. Expressive suppression is linked to increased perceptions of stressors as threatening, which may exacerbate associations between physiological arousal intensity and interpretations of physiological arousal as debilitative. However, the effect of expressive suppression on the association between perceptions of physiological arousal intensity and interpretation remains untested. A sample of 224 undergraduate students completed two psychological acute stress tasks and rated the intensity of their perceived physiological arousal and whether they believed this physiological arousal to be facilitative or debilitative. Before the second stress task, half of the participants were randomly assigned to be instructed to engage in expressive suppression during the task; the remaining participants were instructed to not suppress their emotional expressions. Experimental group assignment moderated associations between physiological arousal intensity and interpretation. In the suppression group, within‐person increases in physiological arousal intensity were more strongly associated with more debilitative physiological interpretations. The present study suggests that engaging in expressive suppression during stress causes increases in the intensity of perceived physiological arousal to be interpreted as more debilitating, with implications for stress‐related anxiety
Arousal · Intensity (physics) · Low arousal theory · Perception · Psychophysiology · Stressor · Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes · Mental Health Research Topics · Stress Responses and Cortisol
Hiding feelings
Emotion Regulation
Are expressive suppression and cognitive reappraisal associated with stress-related symptoms?
Emotion regulation in social anxiety and depression
Acute psychosocial stress
Gender and age differences in emotion regulation strategies and their relationship to depressive symptoms
Just think
Emotion regulation
Coherence between subjective experience and physiology in emotion
Emotional coherence in early and later adulthood during sadness reactivity and regulation
The consequences of suppressing affective displays in romantic relationships
Emotion regulation and emotion coherence
Hidden feelings
The Emerging Field of Emotion Regulation
Effects of arousal reappraisal on the anxiety responses to stress
Subjective, physiological, and behavioral effects of threat and challenge appraisal
Emotional suppression
Meta-analysis of the relations of anxiety sensitivity to the depressive and anxiety disorders
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |