A novel task for measuring numerical bias among adults
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21305809 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Shachar Hochman (0000-0002-8322-3255, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, corresponding author), Mattan S Ben-Shachar (Ben-Gurion University of the Negev), Roi Cohen Kadosh (0000-0002-5564-5469, University of Surrey), Avishai Henik (0000-0002-5665-6004, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 271 |
| Pages | 106439 |
| Publication date | 2026-06-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Cognition (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0010-0277 • E-ISSN: 1873-7838 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.cognition.2026.106439 |
| PMID | 41519047 |
| OpenAlex | W7119846276 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 54 |
Numerical bias is the spontaneous tendency to base decisions on numerical rather than equally available non-numerical information. We introduce the Congruent Learning-Incongruent Probe (CLIP) task, a computerised paradigm for indexing numerical bias in adults. The task presents digit pairs that vary in numerical value and physical size, organised into blocks. In feedback-based learning trials, digits are congruent (larger number in larger font) and participants learn which stimulus is "correct" for that block. In subsequent no-feedback probe trials (test trials), the same pairs are presented incongruently, revealing whether choices are spontaneously driven by numerical or physical dimensions. A sample of 129 adults completed a multi-day battery to validate the CLIP task. Drift-diffusion modelling indicated substantial individual differences in numerical bias. Higher numerical bias correlated positively with maths fluency and quantitative reasoning, paralleling child findings on spontaneous focus on numerosity (SFON) and maths competence. To establish convergent validity, we also administered a numerical Stroop task that requires suppressing numerical information; individuals with stronger numerical bias showed larger interference and facilitation effects. These findings validate the CLIP task as a reliable measure of numerical bias and, more broadly, highlight how variability in spontaneous numerical processing shapes cognitive-control demands, illuminating the interplay between domain-specific biases and executive function
Cognition · Computer simulation · Numerical cognition · Numerosity adaptation effect · Response bias · Stroop effect · Task (project management) · Cognitive Abilities and Testing · Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills · Numerical Analysis · Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
Time required for Judgements of Numerical Inequality
A psychometrics of individual differences in experimental tasks
Ggeffects
R-squared for Bayesian Regression Models
Individual differences in non-verbal number acuity correlate with maths achievement
To transform or not to transform
Associations of non‐symbolic and symbolic numerical magnitude processing with mathematical competence
BayestestR
HDDM
Gorilla in our midst
Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing
Welcome to the Tidyverse
BRMS
Methods to split cognitive task data for estimating split-half reliability
Longitudinal associations between spontaneous number focusing tendencies, numerical abilities, and mathematics achievement in 4- to 7-year-olds
The mathematical, motivational, and cognitive characteristics of high mathematics achievers in primary school
Dyscalculia and Typical Math Achievement Are Associated With Individual Differences in Number-Specific Executive Function
The laterality effect
Reaction time in differential and developmental research
The reliability paradox
Spontaneous focusing on Arabic number symbols and its association with early mathematical competencies
Detecting outliers
| Highly cited | No |
|---|