Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The word “bed” looks like a bed

Orthographic iconicity in English

Bibliographic Data

ID21306641
AuthorsDavid M Sidhu (0000-0002-0881-2009, Carleton University, corresponding author)
Year2026
Volume274
Pages106550
Publication date2026-09-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueCognition (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0010-0277 • E-ISSN: 1873-7838
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.cognition.2026.106550
PMID42019252
OpenAlexW7155076775
LanguageEN
References cited65

Iconicity refers to the sense of resemblance between aspects of a signal's form and aspects of its meaning. This has traditionally been studied in the sound of words in spoken language, and the visual and kinesthetic properties of signs in signed languages. Here I ask the novel question of whether iconicity can be perceived in the shapes of words in a phonographic script (i.e., one in which symbols code for sounds) by native speakers. I collected ratings of orthographic iconicity (i.e., the extent to which the written form of a word resembles its meaning) for 3,150 English words. Unlike phonological iconicity, words high in orthographic iconicity tended to refer to visual meanings, speaking to the validity of the ratings and the distinction between these two forms of iconicity. Consistent with phonological iconicity, these words tended to be marked (e.g., contain infrequent letters and complex onsets), suggesting a general feature of iconicity. Two instances of objectively quantified resemblance between form and meaning (i.e., between the size and shape of written words and their referents) contributed to orthographic iconicity. Crucially, orthographic iconicity facilitated responses in several mega study datasets, even after controlling for suite of lexical semantic variables. These results suggest that participants can perceive iconicity in the visual appearance of words, and that it has measurable psychological effects

Cognition · Iconicity · Lexico · Orthographic projection · Orthography · Word (group theory) · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · Medical and Biological Sciences · Multisensory perception and integration

  • Arbitrariness, Iconicity, and Systematicity in Language

    Open Access•Mark Dingemanse, Damián E Blasi et al.•Trends in Cognitive Sciences•2015

  • Iconicity in English and Spanish and Its Relation to Lexical Category and Age of Acquisition

    Open Access•Lynn K Perry, Marc Perlman et al.•PLoS ONE•2015

  • Moving beyond Kučera and Francis

    Open Access•Marc Brysbaert, Boris New•Behavior Research Methods•2009

  • The bridge of iconicity

    Open Access•Pamela Perni, Pamela Perniss et al.•Philosophical Transactions of the…•2014

  • The Glasgow Norms

    Open Access•Graham G Scott, Anne Keitel et al.•Behavior Research Methods•2019

  • Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas

    Open Access•Marc Brysbaert, Amy Beth Warriner et al.•Behavior Research Methods•2014

  • Norms of valence, arousal, and dominance for 13,915 English lemmas

    Open Access•Amy Beth Warriner, Victor Kuperman et al.•Behavior Research Methods•2013

  • Moving beyond Coltheart’s N

    Open Access•Tal Yarkoni, David A Balota et al.•Psychonomic Bulletin & Review•2008

  • WordNet

    Open Access•George A Miller•Communications of the ACM•1995

  • The Lancaster Sensorimotor Norms

    Open Access•Dermot Lynott, Louise Connell et al.•Behavior Research Methods•2020

  • Age-of-acquisition ratings for 30,000 English words

    Open Access•Victor Kuperman, Hans Stadthagen-Gonzalez et al.•Behavior Research Methods•2012

  • Iconicity as structure mapping

    Open Access•Karen Emmorey•Philosophical Transactions of the…•2014

  • The English Lexicon Project

    Open Access•David A Balota, Melvin J Yap et al.•Behavior Research Methods•2007

  • How arbitrary is language?

    Open Access•P Monaghan, Richard Shillcock et al.•Philosophical Transactions of the…•2014

  • The Anatomy of Iconicity

    Open Access•Stella Punselie, Bonnie McLean et al.•Open MIND•2024

  • Playful iconicity

    Open Access•Mark Dingemanse, Bill D Thompson•Language and Cognition•2020

  • A data-driven approach to the semantics of iconicity in American Sign Language and English

    Open Access•Bill D Thompson, Marc Perlman et al.•Language and Cognition•2020

  • Sound symbolism shapes the English language

    Open Access•David M Sidhu, Chris Westbury et al.•Psychonomic Bulletin & Review•2021

  • Revisiting the concreteness effect

    Open Access•Elaine Kearney, Katie L McMahon et al.•Cognition•2025

  • Iconicity ratings across the Japanese lexicon

    Arthur Lewis Thompson, Kozui Akita et al.•Linguistics Vanguard•2020

  • Iconicity ratings really do measure iconicity, and they open a new window onto the nature of language

    Bronwyn Winter, Bodo Winter et al.•Linguistics Vanguard•2021

  • Does frequency count? Parental input and the acquisition of vocabulary

    Open Access•Judith C Goodman, Philip S Dale et al.•Journal of Child Language•2008

  • An investigation of iconic language development in four datasets

    Open Access•David M Sidhu, Jennifer L Williamson et al.•Journal of Child Language•2022

  • Sound Symbolism in the Lexicon

    Open Access•David M Sidhu•Language and Linguistics Compass•2025

  • Iconicity in Word Learning and Beyond

    Open Access•Alan KS Nielsen, Alan Nielsen et al.•Language and Speech•2021

  • Iconicity is in the eye of the beholder

    Corrine Occhino, Benjamin Anible et al.•Gesture•2017

  • Advances in the Cross-Linguistic Study of Ideophones

    Open Access•Mark Dingemanse•Language and Linguistics Compass•2012

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae