Field survey methods in Central Italy (Etruria and Umbria)
Between local knowledge and regional traditions
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2130745 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Nicola Terrenato (0000-0002-1053-0094, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1996 |
| Volume | 3 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 216-230 |
| Publication date | 1996-12-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Archaeological Dialogues (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1380-2038 • E-ISSN: 1478-2294 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s1380203800000775 |
| OpenAlex | W2943869156 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 7 |
| References cited | 12 |
The existence of regional traditions, in terms of methods and practices, has been an accepted fact in social sciences with a longer history than archaeology. In disciplines like anthropology and archaeology, with their strong emphasis on the description of phenomena that are peculiar to a given regional context, the development of a set of methodologies common to scholars dealing with the same region (a methodological 'local knowledge') has long been regarded as a natural tendency. It was only as a result of the main thrust connected with the appearance of processual archaeology that the idea (or should we say the myth?) of a universal methodology, i. e. one applicable to all contexts and periods, was developed. Thus, between the 1960s and the early 1980s, in parallel with a very positive standardization and intensification of archaeological techniques, a great effort went into the quest for an ultimate and universal field methodology (Binford 1964). As a result, a very wide agreement was reached fairly soon in some areas; for instance, as far as excavation is concerned, a kind of common practice was established, thanks to figures like Ph. Barker (1977) and E. C. Harris (1979). For some reason field survey has experienced a far less unilinear evolution, with sharp debates arising ever since the earliest attempts at a definition of a modern methodology (see for example the entertaining Hope-Simpson versus Cherry controversy, or the even more amusing debate imagined in Flannery 1976, 131-136
Archaeological theory · Archaeology · Epistemology · Excavation · Flannery · Mythology · Sociology · Anthropology · Archaeological Research and Protection · Archaeology and ancient environmental studies · Classics · Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation · History · Philosophy
Roman Landscapes (Archaeological Monographs of the British School at Rome)
Principles of Archaeological Stratigraphy
Decision Making in Modern Surveys
Archaeological Thought in America
Visibility and Site Recovery in the Cecina Valley Survey, Italy
Settlement history, environment and human exploitation of an intermontane basin in the central Apennines
Settlement history, environment and human exploitation of an intermontane basin in the central Apennines
Principles of Archaeological Stratigraphy
Techniques of Archaeological Excavation
Territory, Time and State
Archaeology as Anthropology
A Consideration of Archaeological Research Design
| Citations per year | 0.25 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 1998 - 2022 (25) |
| Highly cited | No |