Discourse and dialogue. Some observations and further reflections
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2130949 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Kristian Kristiansen (0000-0003-2423-308X), Kristian Uldall Kristiansen (0000-0001-6090-7649, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2004 |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 114-132 |
| Publication date | 2004-12-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Archaeological Dialogues (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1380-2038 • E-ISSN: 1478-2294 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s1380203805251504 |
| OpenAlex | W1988265668 |
| Language | EN |
Is it possible to enter a dialogue across discursive boundaries? Some comments suggest that agents engaged in defining the discourse, or some section of it, tend to guard the gates of their discourse against hostile intrusions (critique). They therefore do not engage in dialogue. The comments by John Robb provide an example of the power of discursive constraints, while Stephen Shennan is willing to open the gates enough for a good discussion. Ulrich Veit provides a critical overview that situates my critique within a wider postprocessual/postmodern framework
Aesthetics · Civil discourse · Discourse analysis · Epistemology · Linguistics · Postmodernism · Sociology · Computer Science · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Philosophy
| Highly cited | No |
|---|