Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

A (limited) defence of Priorianism

Bibliographic Data

ID21335293
AuthorsDaniel Deasy (0000-0002-6305-7499, University College Dublin, corresponding author)
Year2023
Volume66
Issue10
Pages2037-2062
Publication date2023-11-26
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueInquiry (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0020-174X • E-ISSN: 1502-3923
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/0020174x.2020.1850346
OpenAlexW3111576211
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited29

This paper defends Priorianism, a theory in the philosophy of time which combines three theses: first, that there is a metaphysical distinction between the present time and non-present times; second, that there are temporary propositions, that is, propositions that change in truth-value simpliciter over time; and third, that there is change over time only if there are temporary propositions. Priorianism is accepted by many Presentists, Growing Block Theorists, and Moving Spotlight Theorists. However, it is difficult to defend the view without appealing to premises that those who reject the view find controversial. My aim in this paper is to defend Priorianism in a way that largely avoids appealing to such premises. I do three things: first (Section 1), I describe the component theses of Priorianism and the relations between them. Next (Section 2), I show how Priorians can respond to the argument that the B-theory implies that there are temporary propositions, and therefore satisfies the Priorian condition for there being change over time. Finally (Section 3), I defend the Priorian thesis that there is change over time only if there are temporary propositions against an alternative principle of change defended by Ross Cameron (The Moving Spotlight, 2015)

Argument (complex analysis) · B-theory of time · Epistemology · Metaphysics · Section (typography) · Value (mathematics) · Computer Science · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Philosophy · Philosophy and Theoretical Science

  • Higher‐order being and time

    Open Access•Lukas Skiba•Noûs•2025

  • Resolving the puzzle of the changing past

    Open Access•Andrew Geddes•Inquiry•2025

  • Relativism and Monadic Truth

    Herman Cappelen, John Hawthorne•Relativism and monadic truth•2009

  • The Moving Spotlight

    Ross P Cameron•Moving Spotlight•2015

  • Objective Becoming

    Bradford Skow•Objective Becoming•2015

  • Real Time II

    D H Mellor•Real Time II•1998

  • Counterpart Theory and Quantified Modal Logic

    David K Lewis, Inc The Journal Of Philosophy•The Journal of Philosophy•1968

  • A Defense of Presentism

    Ned Markosian•Oxford studies in metaphysics•2004

  • New work for a theory of universals

    David Lewis•Australasian Journal of Philosophy•1983

  • Modal Logic as Metaphysics

    T Williamson•Modal Logic As Metaphysics•2013

  • Writing the Book of the World

    Theodore Sider•Writing the book of the world•2011

  • Everything

    Open Access•T Williamson•Philosophical Perspectives•2003

  • Absolute Actuality and the Plurality of Worlds

    Open Access•Phillip Bricker•Philosophical Perspectives•2006

  • To Be F Is To Be G

    Open Access•Cian Dorr•Philosophical Perspectives•2016

Unique citing works2
Citations per year2
Citation span2025 - 2025 (1)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae