Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Why we Support some Original Ideas but Reject Others

An Application of Signaling Theory

Bibliographic Data

ID21345249
AuthorsSamuel T Hunter (0000-0002-2036-7681, University of Nebraska at Omaha, corresponding author), Lily D Blocker (0000-0003-4354-1897, Leadership and Creativity Research Lab), Melissa B Gutworth (0000-0003-4515-5105, Montclair State University), Julian Allen (Global Talent Management), Julian B Allen (Institut Mines-Télécom Business School)
Year2023
Volume57
Issue2
Pages199-220
Publication date2023-06-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Journal of Creative Behavior (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0022-0175 • E-ISSN: 2162-6057
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/jocb.570
OpenAlexW4308043215
LanguageEN
Citations received6
References cited61

Although organizations say new ideas are desirable, investing in original products rather than the “tried and true” can be unsettling for decision‐makers. This discomfort may be due, in part, to uncertainty surrounding whether a new idea will prove successful. As such, the originality of a creative idea can be paradoxically viewed both as an asset, driving up appeal, as well as a detrimental risk. To help unpack these relationships, we propose that how an original idea is proposed (i.e., pitched) plays a central role in the support it receives. Guided by signaling theory we examined how pitch quality relates to funding for ideas with varying degrees of originality. In a field sample of 245 Kickstarter crowdfunding campaigns, pitch quality for ideas high in originality predicted investment in such ideas. In a follow‐up experimental study, we created high‐ and low‐quality pitches for two products, also varying product originality and product quality. Results highlight the importance of high‐quality pitches for highly original ideas that are associated with reductions in uncertainty. Supplemental analyses suggest that high‐quality pitches improve enthusiasm for a product as well, highlighting a potential second path of support influence

Appeal · Asset (computer security) · Business · Creativity · Enthusiasm · Epistemology · Originality · Political science · Product (mathematics) · Quality (philosophy) · Sample (material) · Computer Science · Digital Games and Media · FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance · Law · Marketing · Mathematics · Philosophy · Private Equity and Venture Capital · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Finding Creativity by Changing Perspectives

    Shiyu Yang, Jeffrey Loewenstein et al.•Creativity Research Journal•2023

  • Malevolent Creativity as Parochial Altruism? Examining the Intergroup Bases of New and Harmful Ideas

    Tin L Nguyen, Alexis L D’amato et al.•Creativity Research Journal•2025

  • What Makes an Idea Risky? The Relations between Perceptions of Idea Novelty, Usefulness, and Risk

    Open Access•Melissa G Keith, Lindsey M Freier et al.•The Journal of Creative Behavior•2024

  • Greater variability in judgements of the value of novel ideas

    Open Access•Wayne Johnson, Wayne A Johnson et al.•Nature Human Behaviour•2024

  • The Effect of Novelty and Usefulness on Creative Idea Adoption

    Open Access•Mingchuan Yu, Xiaotong Liu et al.•The Journal of Creative Behavior•2025

  • Idea readability and complexity in online user innovation communities

    Open Access•Mu Yang, Joseph Amankwah-Amoah et al.•Technology in Society•2026

  • Designing Experiments That Generalize

    Open Access•Scott Highhouse•Organizational Research Methods•2009

  • Attention by design

    Open Access•James D Abbey, Margaret G Meloy•Journal of Operations Management•2017

  • Explaining the justice–performance relationship

    Jason A Colquitt, Jeffery A LePine et al.•Journal of Applied Psychology•2012

  • Probing three-way interactions in moderated multiple regression

    Jeremy Dawson, Andreas W Richter•Journal of Applied Psychology•2006

  • Signaling in Retrospect and the Informational Structure of Markets

    Michael Spence•American Economic Review•2002

  • Selling Issues to Top Management

    Jane E Dutton, Susan J Ashford•Academy of Management Review•1993

  • On doing relevant and rigorous experiments

    Open Access•Sirio Lonati, Bernardo F Quiroga et al.•Journal of Operations Management•2018

  • Methodological Urban Legends

    Open Access•Paul E Spector, Michael T Brannick et al.•Organizational Research Methods•2011

  • When fairness works

    Open Access•A Lind, E Allan Lind et al.•Research in Organizational Behavior•2002

  • The Bias Against Creativity

    Open Access•Jennifer S Mueller, Jennifer Mueller et al.•Psychological Science•2012

  • Uncertainty and anticipation in anxiety

    Open Access•Daniel W Grupe, Dan W Grupe et al.•Nature Reviews Neuroscience•2013

  • Signaling Theory

    Open Access•Brian L Connelly, S Trevis Certo et al.•Journal of Management•2011

  • Risk as Analysis and Risk as Feelings

    Open Access•Paul Slovic, Melissa L Finucane et al.•Risk Analysis•2004

  • The psychology of interpersonal relations.

    Fritz Heider•1958

  • Moderation in Management Research

    Open Access•Jeremy Dawson, Jeremy F Dawson•Journal of Business and Psychology•2013

  • Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect

    David Watson, David C Watson et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1988

  • Construing creativity

    Jennifer S Mueller, Jennifer Mueller et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•2013

  • Social psychology of creativity

    Teresa M Amabile•Journal of Personality and Social…•1982

  • Aesthetic appraisal of product designs

    Open Access•Janneke Blijlevens, Claus-Christian Carbon et al.•British Journal of Psychology•2012

  • Most advanced, yet acceptable

    Open Access•Paul Hekkert, Dirk Snelders et al.•British Journal of Psychology•2003

  • Statistical difficulties of detecting interactions and moderator effects

    Gary H Mcclelland, Charles M Judd•Psychological Bulletin•1993

Citations per year2
Citation span2023 - 2026 (4)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae