The Use of Video Annotation Tools and Informal Online Discussions to Explore Preservice Teachers’ Self- and Peer-Evaluation of Academic Feedback
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21347201 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Amani Zaier (0000-0001-9379-250X, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, USA, corresponding author), Ismahan Arslan‐Ari (0000-0003-3497-7058, University of South Carolina), Ismahan Arslan-Ari (University of South Carolina, Columbia, USA), Faith Maina (Texas Tech University, Lubbock, USA) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 201 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 19-27 |
| Publication date | 2021-01-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Education (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-0574 • E-ISSN: 2515-5741 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0022057420903269 |
| OpenAlex | W3004692279 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 13 |
This study explored the quality of preservice teachers’ self- and peer-academic feedback using video annotation tools to capture their teaching practices. They were also provided with an informal online discussion board as part of the peer support system. Twenty-five preservice teachers at a large university in the Southwestern United States volunteered to participate in this study. Data revealed a striking difference between self-evaluation and peer-evaluation. Preservice teachers rated themselves considerably higher compared with their peer-evaluation. The quality of the academic feedback and evaluation remained at the surface level with a mismatch between areas of refinement and areas of reinforcement. Evidence-based feedback and constructive criticism for areas of refinement were openly given during the informal discussion forums. Despite the inconsistency, preservice teachers perceived online communication through discussion posts as a valuable source of building relationships and providing support system
Annotation · Constructive · Criticism · Higher education · Mathematics education · Multimedia · Online video · Pedagogy · Peer evaluation · Peer feedback · Political science · Quality (philosophy) · Computer Science · Evaluation of Teaching Practices · Psychology · Reflective Practices in Education · Student Assessment and Feedback
Participatory Media Literacy in Collaborative Video Annotation
Disrupted studying? University students’ experiences of remote vs. on-site teaching and learning
Sluggish or fast? Interrogating Nigeria’s economic and financial crimes commission’s effectiveness in offloading the load of internal inconsistencies
Making Sense of Assessment Feedback in Higher Education
‘Only true friends could be cruelly honest’
Rethinking feedback practices in higher education
Exploring the use of peer assessment as a vehicle for closing the gap between feedback given and feedback used
A Review of High‐Leverage Teaching Practices
Revisiting Teacher Feedback in EFL Writing from Sociocultural Perspectives
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Autoscopia
| Citations per year | 0.6 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2021 - 2026 (6) |
| Highly cited | No |