Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Experts and arbitration outcomes

Insights from public procurement contract disputes

Bibliographic Data

ID21358008
AuthorsClaudio Detotto (0000-0003-3801-2202, University of Corsica & CRENoS Corte France), Riccardo Marselli (University of Naples Parthenope & CRENoS & CRISEI Naples Italy, corresponding author), Bryan Mccannon (0000-0003-2433-2803, Illinois Wesleyan University), Bryan C McCannon (Illinois Wesleyan University Bloomington Illinois USA), Marco Vannini (0000-0001-9685-0736, University of Sassari & CRENoS Sassari Italy)
Year2024
Volume77
Issue4
Pages922-943
Publication date2024-11-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueKyklos (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0023-5962 • E-ISSN: 1467-6435
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/kykl.12399
OpenAlexW4399703560
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited29

We explore the use of experts in arbitration proceedings by analysing public procurement contract disputes in Italy. Balancing cost with accuracy, participants to a contract select arbitration when speedy dispute resolution is valued highly. Alternative dispute resolution mechanisms tend to give appointed arbitrators discretion in how to proceed. Consequently, principal‐agent problems can arise. Using an inverse‐probability‐weighted approach, we show that the use of an expert causes a slowing down of the case resolution, without having an effect on the outcome of the dispute nor resolving uncertainty as measured by unanimous decisions by the panel of arbitrators. Conflict resolution mechanism designers should consider the alignment of incentives between the disputants and the service providers

Arbitration · Business · Compulsory arbitration · Contract management · Economics · Law and economics · Political science · Procurement · Corruption and Economic Development · Law · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems · Marketing · Public Procurement and Policy

  • Judicial roles in international arbitration

    Open Access•Gatot P Soemartono, Keqi Wu et al.•Cogent Social Sciences•2026

  • Doubly Robust Estimation of Causal Effects

    Michele Jonsson Funk, Daniel Westreich et al.•American Journal of Epidemiology•2011

  • Causal inference with observational data

    Open Access•Kaori Narita, Juan de Díos Tena et al.•The Leadership Quarterly•2023

  • Making Democracy Work

    Robert D Putnam, Robert Leonardi et al.•Making Democracy Work•1994

  • Bargaining and the Role of Expert Agents

    Orley Ashenfelter, Gordon B Dahl•The Review of Economics and…•2012

  • Arbitration in classical Athens

    Open Access•Bryan Mccannon, Bryan C McCannon•Constitutional Political Economy•2018

  • Do Institutions Play a Role in Skilled Migration? The Case of Italy

    Annamaria Nifo, Gaetano Vecchione•Regional Studies•2013

  • The Use of Experts in WTO Dispute Settlement

    Open Access•Joost Pauwelyn•International and Comparative Law…•2002

  • An Analysis of Final-Offer Arbitration

    Open Access•Henry S Farber•Journal of Conflict Resolution•1980

  • Recent Developments in the Econometrics of Program Evaluation

    Guido W Imbens, Jeffrey M Wooldridge•Journal of Economic Literature•2009

Unique citing works1
Citations per year1
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae