Under the Law
How is your community depicted in the curriculum? Who decides
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21369985 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Robert Kim (0000-0001-6909-8841, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 102 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 63-64 |
| Publication date | 2021-02-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Phi Delta Kappan (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0031-7217 • E-ISSN: 1940-6487 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0031721721992571 |
| OpenAlex | W3125375485 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
A case in California reaffirms that courts are reluctant to intervene when families are concerned about school curricula. In CAPEEM v. Torlakson, parents of Hindu children complained that the state’s history and social science standards are framework discriminated against them by inaccurately and disparingingly representing their faith. Bob Kim describes the plaintiffs’ arguments, the case’s journey through the courts, and how the court’s ruling against the plaintiffs relates to other cases involving objections to school curricula
Curriculum · Faith · Plaintiff · Political science · Sociology · State (computer science) · Diverse Education Studies and Reforms · Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy · Law · Religious Education and Schools
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,8 |
| Citation span | 2021 - 2024 (4) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |