Parsimony and internal complexity
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21370652 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Simon Thunder (0000-0003-4211-1369, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Publication date | 2026-07-04 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Philosophical Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0031-8116 • E-ISSN: 1573-0883 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s11098-026-02575-1 |
| OpenAlex | W7167346594 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 25 |
I argue in favour of a novel conception of ontological parsimony. According to this novel conception, ontological parsimony qua theoretical virtue should not be measured solely by the number of entities (or kinds of entities, or fundamental kinds of entities) posited, but also by the internal complexity of those entities. I argue for this claim via the familiar methodology of appealing to intuitions about particular cases and to observations about successful scientific methodology. I furthermore point out some implications of my argument for other debates, and suggest a method for rendering parsimony qua degree of internal complexity commensurable with traditional conceptions of parsimony
Argument (complex analysis) · Metaphysics · Occam's razor · Philosophy of language · Philosophy of mind · Philosophy of science · Virtue · Embodied and Extended Cognition · Philosophy and History of Science · Philosophy and Theoretical Science
The Tools of Metaphysics and the Metaphysics of Science
Making Things Up
Objects
What Not to Multiply Without Necessity
A Puzzle About Parsimony
The Structure of Appearance
Ideological parsimony
Monism
Quantitative Parsimony and Explanatory Power
Quantitative Parsimony
Quantitative Parsimony
The Least Discerning and Most Promiscuous Truthmaker
When Is Parsimony a Virtue
The Explosion of Being
Quantum Gravity and Mereology
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |