Tracing the Singular of Contradiction in Contradiction(s) Set Free
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21372128 |
|---|---|
| Authors | André Flicker (0009-0003-6086-3449, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 67 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 577-594 |
| Publication date | 2023-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Philosophy Today (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0031-8256 • E-ISSN: 2329-8596 |
| Publisher | Philosophy Documentation Center (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.5840/philtoday2023629490 |
| OpenAlex | W4382998315 |
| Language | EN |
Goldschmidt’s Contradiction Set Free confronts us with a variety of topics, political and philosophical topoi, in which he traces contradictions of thought and action. This article focuses on Goldschmidt’s omission of the sphere of language as a site of contradiction in Contradiction Set Free. I argue that it is a deliberate choice on the part of Goldschmidt to not project a metalanguage of contradiction, but to probe philosophy’s involvement in the practice of language and thus present a critique of philosophy through the contradictory impulse of language. First, I discuss the status Goldschmidt ascribes to the work of language for philosophy. From here, I engage in a discussion of the meaning of Ergriffenheit (awe) in Contradiction Set Free. Finally, I analyze two of Goldschmidt’s uses of parables and conclude with a reference to a parable by Franz Kafka
Contradiction · Epistemology · Linguistics · Metalanguage · Metaphysics · Philosophy of language · Sociology · Franz Kafka Literary Studies · German Literature and Culture Studies · Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel · Philosophy
| Highly cited | No |
|---|