Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

On the association between gender-science stereotypes’ endorsement and gender bias attribution

Bibliographic Data

ID21378484
AuthorsElena De Gioannis (0000-0003-4341-3166, University of Milan, corresponding author)
Year2024
Volume58
Issue4
Pages3087-3106
Publication date2024-08-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueQuality & Quantity (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0033-5177 • E-ISSN: 1573-7845
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s11135-023-01790-w
OpenAlexW4389486150
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited64

The existence and persistence of stereotypes on gender and science, as well as their influence on attitudes and behaviors, have been largely studied worldwide. Current measures of gender-science stereotypes are mainly descriptive and do not ask respondents their opinions about the perceived cause(s) of these gender differences. However, empirical evidence suggests that gender bias attribution, i.e., the difference in the causes to which gender differences are attributed, has heterogeneous consequences. Here, it was exploited the fact that Project Implicit includes both instruments of gender-science stereotypes and gender bias attribution to test whether and to what extent two components of gender bias attribution, i.e., causes attributed to personal characteristics and those attributed to social/contextual factors, were associated with the endorsement of implicit and explicit gender-science stereotypes. Both an exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis tested whether the instrument on gender bias attribution in Project Implicit could be decomposed into two components, while an SEM (Structural Equation Modeling) analysis tested the hypothesized association. The factor analysis confirmed that bias attribution should be decomposed into two distinct components, “internal factors” and “external factors”. Finally, the association between these two components and implicit and explicit gender stereotypes varied depending on the participant's gender. Explicit gender stereotypes' endorsement was positively associated with the external component in the case of women and with the internal component in the case of men. Conversely, the association between attribution and implicit gender stereotypes was null

Association (psychology) · Attribution · Confirmatory factor analysis · Developmental psychology · Gender bias · Gender role · Implicit-association test · Structural equation modeling · Behavioral Health and Interventions · Climate Change Communication and Perception · Psychology · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Gender-essentialist beliefs and the gender gap in STEM

    Open Access•Elena De Gioannis•Quality & Quantity•2025

  • Gender and academic intentions

    Open Access•Elena De Gioannis•Social Psychology of Education•2026

  • On the gender–science stereotypes held by scientists

    Open Access•Frederick L Smyth, Brian A Nosek•Frontiers in Psychology•2015

  • Lazy, Dumb, or Industrious

    Open Access•Christine Reyna•Educational Psychology Review•2000

  • Implicit Stereotypes

    Open Access•Michela Carlana•The Quarterly Journal of Economics•2019

  • Gender Gap in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM)

    Open Access•Ming-Te Wang, Jessica L Degol•Educational Psychology Review•2017

  • Social perception and phenomenal causality.

    Fritz Heider•Psychological Review•1944

  • On the leaky math pipeline

    Melanie C Steffens, Melanie Steffens et al.•Journal of Educational Psychology•2010

  • A Meta-Analysis on the Correlation Between the Implicit Association Test and Explicit Self-Report Measures

    Open Access•Wilhelm Hofmann, Bertram Gawronski et al.•Personality and Social Psychology…•2005

  • Exposure to Scientific Theories Affects Women's Math Performance

    Open Access•Ilan Dar-Nimrod, Steven J Heine•Science•2006

  • Sex Differences in Intrinsic Aptitude for Mathematics and Science?

    Elizabeth S Spelke•American Psychologist•2005

  • A Goal Congruity Model of Role Entry, Engagement, and Exit

    Open Access•Amanda B Diekman, Mia Steinberg et al.•Personality and Social Psychology…•2017

  • Tests of Significance in Factor Analysis

    Open Access•M S Bartlett•British Journal of Statistical…•1950

  • The Impact of Gender Stereotypes on the Self-Concept of Female Students in STEM Subjects with an Under-Representation of Females

    Open Access•Bernhard Ertl, Silke Luttenberger et al.•Frontiers in Psychology•2017

  • Women’s representation in science predicts national gender-science stereotypes

    David I Miller, Alice H Eagly et al.•Journal of Educational Psychology•2015

  • Polychoric versus Pearson correlations in exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of ordinal variables

    Open Access•Francisco Pablo Holgado Tello, Francisco Pablo Holgado–Tello et al.•Quality & Quantity•2010

  • The Correlates and Consequences of Newspaper Reports of Research on Sex Differences

    Open Access•Victoria L Brescoll, Victoria Brescoll et al.•Psychological Science•2004

  • A Beginner’s Guide to Factor Analysis

    Open Access•An Gie Yong, Sean Pearce•Tutorials in Quantitative Methods…•2013

  • An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion.

    Bernard Weiner•Psychological Review•1985

  • Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis

    Li‐tze Hu, Peter M Bentler•Structural Equation Modeling: A…•1999

  • Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data

    Open Access•Cheng-Hsien Li•Behavior Research Methods•2016

  • The conundrum of gender-science stereotypes

    Open Access•Elena De Gioannis•Quality & Quantity•2023

  • What Is the Implicit Gender-Science Stereotype? Exploring Correlations Between the Gender-Science IAT and Self-Report Measures

    Open Access•Hila Zitelny, Michal Shalom et al.•Social Psychological and…•2017

  • The Effect of Estimation Methods on SEM Fit Indices

    Open Access•Dexin Shi, Alberto Maydeu-Olivares et al.•Educational and Psychological…•2020

  • Little Jiffy, Mark Iv

    Open Access•Henry F Kaiser, John Rice et al.•Educational and Psychological…•1974

  • Patterns of Implicit and Explicit Attitudes

    Open Access•Tessa E S Charlesworth, Mahzarin R Banaji•Psychological Science•2019

  • Psychology of Prejudice and Discrimination

    Bernard E Whitley, Mary E Kite et al.•Psychology of Prejudice and…•2016

  • Improving Fit Indices in Structural Equation Modeling with Categorical Data

    Victoria Savalei•Multivariate Behavioral Research•2021

  • On the Computation of the RMSEA and CFI from the Mean-And-Variance Corrected Test Statistic with Nonnormal Data in SEM

    Victoria Savalei•Multivariate Behavioral Research•2018

  • Exploring attitudes towards gender and science

    Open Access•Lynn Farrell, Andy Cochrane et al.•Journal of Contextual Behavioral…•2015

  • Changing stereotypes, changing grades

    Open Access•Laura R Ramsey, Denise Sekaquaptewa•Social Psychology of Education•2010

  • Variations of Gender–math Stereotype Content Affect Women’s Vulnerability to Stereotype Threat

    Open Access•Dustin B Thoman, Paul H White et al.•Sex Roles•2008

  • Not Feeling Good in STEM

    Open Access•Carolin Schuster, Sarah Martiny•Sex Roles•2016

  • The Costs of Accepting Gender Differences

    Open Access•Toni Schmader, Michaela Johns et al.•Sex Roles•2004

  • Gender Stereotypes Influence How People Explain Gender Disparities in the Workplace

    Open Access•Jessica L Cundiff, Theresa K Vescio•Sex Roles•2016

  • Chilean kindergarten children’s beliefs about mathematics

    Open Access•M Francisca del Río, Katherine Strasser et al.•Developmental Psychology•2019

  • Implicit stereotypes and women’s math performance

    Open Access•Amy K Kiefer, Denise Sekaquaptewa•Journal of Experimental Social…•2006

  • Psychological essentialism and stereotype endorsement

    Open Access•Brock Bastian, Nick Haslam•Journal of Experimental Social…•2005

  • A Brief Guide to Structural Equation Modeling

    Open Access•Rebecca Weston, Paul A Gore•The Counseling Psychologist•2006

  • Implicit Social Cognitions Predict Sex Differences in Math Engagement and Achievement

    Open Access•Brian A Nosek, Frederick L Smyth•American Educational Research…•2011

  • Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test

    Anthony G Greenwald, Brian A Nosek et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2003

  • Math = male, me = female, therefore math ≠ me

    Brian A Nosek, Mahzarin R Banaji et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2002

  • Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition

    Anthony G Greenwald, Debbie E Mcghee et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1998

  • Gender Stereotypes

    Naomi Ellemers•Annual Review of Psychology•2017

  • Gender stereotypes stem from the distribution of women and men into social roles

    Alice H Eagly, Valerie J Steffen•Journal of Personality and Social…•1984

  • A theory of motivation for some classroom experiences

    Bernard Weiner•Journal of Educational Psychology•1979

  • When is a correlation matrix appropriate for factor analysis? Some decision rules

    Charles D Dziuban, Edwin C Shirkey•Psychological Bulletin•1974

  • Gender stereotypes are reflected in the distributional structure of 25 languages

    Open Access•Molly Lewis, Gary Lupyan•Nature Human Behaviour•2020

Citations per year2
Citation span2025 - 2026 (2)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae