On the association between gender-science stereotypes’ endorsement and gender bias attribution
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21378484 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Elena De Gioannis (0000-0003-4341-3166, University of Milan, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 58 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 3087-3106 |
| Publication date | 2024-08-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Quality & Quantity (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0033-5177 • E-ISSN: 1573-7845 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s11135-023-01790-w |
| OpenAlex | W4389486150 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 64 |
The existence and persistence of stereotypes on gender and science, as well as their influence on attitudes and behaviors, have been largely studied worldwide. Current measures of gender-science stereotypes are mainly descriptive and do not ask respondents their opinions about the perceived cause(s) of these gender differences. However, empirical evidence suggests that gender bias attribution, i.e., the difference in the causes to which gender differences are attributed, has heterogeneous consequences. Here, it was exploited the fact that Project Implicit includes both instruments of gender-science stereotypes and gender bias attribution to test whether and to what extent two components of gender bias attribution, i.e., causes attributed to personal characteristics and those attributed to social/contextual factors, were associated with the endorsement of implicit and explicit gender-science stereotypes. Both an exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis tested whether the instrument on gender bias attribution in Project Implicit could be decomposed into two components, while an SEM (Structural Equation Modeling) analysis tested the hypothesized association. The factor analysis confirmed that bias attribution should be decomposed into two distinct components, “internal factors” and “external factors”. Finally, the association between these two components and implicit and explicit gender stereotypes varied depending on the participant's gender. Explicit gender stereotypes' endorsement was positively associated with the external component in the case of women and with the internal component in the case of men. Conversely, the association between attribution and implicit gender stereotypes was null
Association (psychology) · Attribution · Confirmatory factor analysis · Developmental psychology · Gender bias · Gender role · Implicit-association test · Structural equation modeling · Behavioral Health and Interventions · Climate Change Communication and Perception · Psychology · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Psychology
On the gender–science stereotypes held by scientists
Lazy, Dumb, or Industrious
Implicit Stereotypes
Gender Gap in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM)
Social perception and phenomenal causality.
On the leaky math pipeline
A Meta-Analysis on the Correlation Between the Implicit Association Test and Explicit Self-Report Measures
Exposure to Scientific Theories Affects Women's Math Performance
Sex Differences in Intrinsic Aptitude for Mathematics and Science?
A Goal Congruity Model of Role Entry, Engagement, and Exit
Tests of Significance in Factor Analysis
The Impact of Gender Stereotypes on the Self-Concept of Female Students in STEM Subjects with an Under-Representation of Females
Women’s representation in science predicts national gender-science stereotypes
Polychoric versus Pearson correlations in exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of ordinal variables
The Correlates and Consequences of Newspaper Reports of Research on Sex Differences
A Beginner’s Guide to Factor Analysis
An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion.
Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis
Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data
The conundrum of gender-science stereotypes
What Is the Implicit Gender-Science Stereotype? Exploring Correlations Between the Gender-Science IAT and Self-Report Measures
The Effect of Estimation Methods on SEM Fit Indices
Little Jiffy, Mark Iv
Patterns of Implicit and Explicit Attitudes
Psychology of Prejudice and Discrimination
Improving Fit Indices in Structural Equation Modeling with Categorical Data
On the Computation of the RMSEA and CFI from the Mean-And-Variance Corrected Test Statistic with Nonnormal Data in SEM
Exploring attitudes towards gender and science
Changing stereotypes, changing grades
Variations of Gender–math Stereotype Content Affect Women’s Vulnerability to Stereotype Threat
Not Feeling Good in STEM
The Costs of Accepting Gender Differences
Gender Stereotypes Influence How People Explain Gender Disparities in the Workplace
Chilean kindergarten children’s beliefs about mathematics
Implicit stereotypes and women’s math performance
Psychological essentialism and stereotype endorsement
A Brief Guide to Structural Equation Modeling
Implicit Social Cognitions Predict Sex Differences in Math Engagement and Achievement
Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test
Math = male, me = female, therefore math ≠ me
Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition
Gender Stereotypes
Gender stereotypes stem from the distribution of women and men into social roles
A theory of motivation for some classroom experiences
When is a correlation matrix appropriate for factor analysis? Some decision rules
Gender stereotypes are reflected in the distributional structure of 25 languages
| Citations per year | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Highly cited | No |