The Concept of Critical Thinking in Teacher Education
A Systematic Review
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21381069 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jarmila Bubikova-Moan (0000-0002-0573-5124, OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University), Leila E Ferguson (0000-0001-9115-5662, Høyskolen Kristiania), Anette Andresen (0000-0003-1058-2262, Høyskolen Kristiania) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Publication date | 2026-05-09 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Review of Educational Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0034-6543 • E-ISSN: 1935-1046 |
| Publisher | American Educational Research Association (AERA) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.3102/00346543261438479 |
| OpenAlex | W7160714982 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 89 |
This systematic review sheds light on the scientific landscape of critical thinking (CT) in teacher education (TED) by synthesizing how CT in TED has been investigated in terms of selected features of international scholarship on the topic and how CT has been conceptualized in this scholarship. Based on 208 included studies, our results show heterogeneity in targeted educational levels, school subjects, geography and adopted methodologies. A sharp increase in publication rates is also documented. We show further that conceptualizations nested in argumentation theory predominate. Often, scholars offer implicit definitions and use varied, related terminology, blurring CT as a concept. Lastly, explicit clarifications on the role of disciplinary knowledge in CT are often absent. We argue for an emphasis on conceptual clarity in future scholarship on CT in TED, consider the implications of our findings and offer actionable proposals for theory and practice
Argumentation theory · CLARITY · Critical theory · Critical thinking · Discipline · Scholarship · Education and Critical Thinking Development · Educational Strategies and Epistemologies · Science Education and Pedagogy
How we think.
Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences
Systematic Synthesis of Qualitative Research
Instructional Interventions Affecting Critical Thinking Skills and Dispositions
Focusing the Conceptual Lens on Metacognition, Self-regulation, and Self-regulated Learning
Strategies for Teaching Students to Think Critically
Conducting a meta-ethnography of qualitative literature
The PRISMA 2020 statement
Conceptualising critical thinking and its research in teacher education
Technology-scaffolded peer assessment for developing critical thinking in pre-service teacher training
Preservice music teachers in Korea and their collaborative reflection with peers
Preservice science teachers' sociopolitical consciousness
A dialogic theoretical foundation for integrating generative AI into pedagogical design
Argumentation in Early Childhood
Qualitative Researching
An instrument to support thinking critically about critical thinking in online asynchronous discussions
Qualitative Metasynthesis
Creative Thinking and Teaching for Creativity in Elementary School Science
Critical thinking practices in teacher education programmes
A systematic review on critical thinking intervention studies in higher education across professional fields
Psychometric Properties of Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal for a Sample of Education Majors
Exploring Factors of a Web-Based Seminar That Influence Hispanic Preservice Teachers’ Critical Thinking and Problem-Solving Skills
Promoting inclusiveness, creativity and critical thinking through digital storytelling among EFL teacher candidates
How do primary pre‐service teachers in a regional Australian university plan for teaching, learning and acting in environmentally responsible ways
Implementing multiple assessment modes in an interdisciplinary environmental education course
Identification of Critical Thinking Dispositions of Teacher Candidates
First steps in teaching argumentation
A Developmental Model of Critical Thinking
Critical thinking assessment
Examining Preservice Teachers' Perceptions of Planning for Culturally Relevant Disciplinary Literacy
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |