Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

A dialogic theoretical foundation for integrating generative AI into pedagogical design

Bibliographic Data

ID21297239
AuthorsRupert Wegerif (0000-0003-2278-2245, Faculty of Education University of Cambridge Cambridge UK, corresponding author), Imogen Casebourne (0000-0001-5595-5902, Hughes Hall University of Cambridge Cambridge UK)
Year2026
Volume57
Issue3
Pages639-654
Publication date2026-05-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueBritish Journal of Educational Technology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0007-1013 • E-ISSN: 1467-8535
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/bjet.70026
OpenAlexW4416304339
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited35

Generative AI presents a profound challenge to the existing structures and purposes of education. It forces us to reconsider not only how we teach and learn but also, more fundamentally, what education is for. This conceptual paper argues that, in order to integrate AI into education in a way that can meet the major challenges facing humanity, ranging from ecological crisis to the future of democratic societies, we must reframe education. Drawing on the nature and potential of generative AI in conjunction with educational theory, we propose a double dialogic pedagogy that recognises education as both teaching thinking through dialogue and inducting students into participation in the long‐term powerful dialogues of culture. We relate this double dialogic pedagogy with AI to education for collective intelligence. This pedagogy positions AI not as a replacement for human thinking, but as a partner in expanding the space of dialogue. By articulating this theoretical foundation, we offer a basis for the future design of educational practices and technologies that can support human flourishing in an age of accelerating technological change. Practitioner notes What is already known about this topic The rise of generative AI, particularly large language models, poses both opportunities and challenges for education. While existing research highlights AI's potential to support personalised learning through intelligent tutoring systems, concerns remain about its possible negative impact on students' critical and creative thinking. Previous studies have also noted the need for educational theory to keep pace with technological developments, yet little work has been done to articulate a pedagogical framework that addresses the broader societal and environmental challenges of the AI era. What this paper adds This paper proposes a double dialogic pedagogy as a theoretical foundation for integrating AI into educational design. It situates current developments in AI within a historical and philosophical context, drawing on dialogic theory and the concept of the pharmakon to argue that AI is neither inherently beneficial nor harmful, but depends on pedagogical framing. The paper advances the field by explicitly linking AI‐supported learning to education for collective intelligence, offering concrete illustrations of how AI can support both dialogic learning and induction into long‐term cultural dialogues. Implications for practice and/or policy This paper suggests that educational practice should shift from focusing on individual knowledge acquisition towards cultivating collective intelligence through dialogic pedagogy. Policymakers and educators are encouraged to design AI‐supported learning environments that promote collaborative problem‐solving and critical engagement with real‐world challenges, such as those posed by the Anthropocene. Assessment policies should be re‐evaluated to reward collaborative inquiry and ethical reasoning, rather than individual content reproduction. This reconceptualisation positions education as a key enabler of planetary‐level self‐regulation and human flourishing in the face of technological and environmental disruptions

Citizen journalism · Cognitive reframing · Democracy · Dialogic · Educational technology · Flourishing · Foundation (evidence) · Generative grammar · Sociology of Education · AI in Service Interactions · Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning · Text Readability and Simplification

  • When AI only asks

    Open Access•Anne Katrine Westbye, Harald Eriksen et al.•Frontiers in Education•2026

  • Student-AI interaction patterns in collaborative problem solving using ordered network analysis

    Jinhee Kim, Guang Yang et al.•Interactive Learning Environments•2026

  • The Concept of Critical Thinking in Teacher Education

    Open Access•Jarmila Bubikova-Moan, Leila E Ferguson et al.•Review of Educational Research•2026

  • Agency in learning and self‐directed learning with generative AI

    Open Access•Natasha Anne Rappa, Shanti Divaharan et al.•British Journal of Educational…•2026

  • Dialogic Education and Technology

    Open Access•Rupert Wegerif•Dialogic Education and…•2007

  • Critique of Pure Reason

    Open Access•Immanuel Kant, Paul Guyer et al.•Critique of Pure Reason•1998

  • Dialogic

    Rupert Wegerif•Dialogic•2013

  • Problems of Dostoevsky's Poetics

    Mikhail Bakhtin, M M Bakhtin et al.•Problems of Dostoevsky's Poetics•1984

  • The Printing Press as an Agent of Change

    Open Access•Elizabeth L Eisenstein•Printing Press As an Agent of…•1980

  • Technics and Time, 1

    Bernard Stiegler•Technics and Time, 1•1998

  • The Impact of Generative AI on Critical Thinking

    Open Access•Hao-Ping Lee, Advait Sarkar et al.•Proceedings of the 2025 CHI…•2025

  • Evidence for a Collective Intelligence Factor in the Performance of Human Groups

    Open Access•Anita Williams Woolley, Christopher F Chabris et al.•Science•2010

  • Eliza—a computer program for the study of natural language communication between man and machine

    Open Access•Joseph Weizenbaum•Communications of the ACM•1966

  • Intelligent tutoring systems and learning outcomes

    Wenting Ma, Olusola O Adesope et al.•Journal of Educational Psychology•2014

  • The Relative Effectiveness of Human Tutoring, Intelligent Tutoring Systems, and Other Tutoring Systems

    KURT VanLEHN•Educational Psychologist•2011

  • Orality and Literacy

    Walter J Ong•Oralität und Literalität•1982

  • Interthinking

    Karen Littleton, Neil Mercer•Interthinking•2013

  • Totality and Infinity

    Open Access•Emmanuel Levinas•Totality and Infinity•1991

  • ChatGPT and the entangled evolution of society, education, and technology

    Open Access•Steven Watson, Jonathan Romic•European Journal of Educational…•2025

  • Education for collective intelligence

    Open Access•M Janice Hogan, Michael J Hogan et al.•Irish Educational Studies•2025

  • The Living Hand of the Past

    Open Access•Roy Pea, Jennifer Cole et al.•Human Development•2019

  • Learning by Observing and Pitching In to Family and Community Endeavors

    Open Access•B Rogoff•Human Development•2014

  • Moral Codes

    Open Access•Alan F Blackwell•Moral Codes•2024

  • Situated Learning

    Open Access•Jean Lave, Etienne Wenger•Situated Learning•1991

Unique citing works4
Citations per year4
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 4

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae