Lobolo is child-price
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2138225 |
|---|---|
| Authors | M D W Jeffreys (University of the Witwatersrand, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1951 |
| Volume | 10 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 145-184 |
| Publication date | 1951-12-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | African Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0002-0184 • E-ISSN: 1469-2872 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/00020185108706853 |
| OpenAlex | W1977977163 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 16 |
| References cited | 17 |
SYNOPSIS SYNOPSIS The introduction deals with the various attempts to translate, e.g., a term like lobolo by such phrases as bride‐price, earnest, compensation, etc., including the recommendation not to translate such terms but to use, e.g. lobolo itself, in place of such terms or translations. The translation Child‐price is then declared to be the only correct translation possible. Marriage among the patriarchal, patrilocal Negroes of Africa is discussed including the assertions of many that lobolo is necessary for marriage. Lobolo is then shown not to be necessary for a marriage. The ceremony that constitutes a marriage' is discussed and found to be a rite of passage wherein lobolo has no function. The essential of a marriage is the communal or reintegrating meal. Valid marriages are shown to exist without lobolo. Lobolo is then shown to function effetively without any marriage taking place. The function of lobolo is discussed and it is found that its function is to transfer the status of a child from its position in its mother's group to a status in its cultural father's group; i.e. that lobolo is the price of child transfer from matrilineal relatives to patrilineal relatives, i.e. is the child‐price. The position and function of both Sororate and of Levirate inevitably follow from this function of lobolo. The rules of divorce then become clear. The conclusions show that Malinowski, the functionalist, failed completely to grasp the function of lobolo, but that e.g. persons like Livingstone, Margaret Read, Linton and others grasped the idea that whosoever paid the lobolo bought the children; i.e. that lobolo is child‐price
Ceremony · Economics · Function (biology · Genealogy · Political science · Position (finance · Rite · Sociology · African history and culture analysis · African history and culture studies · History · Law
Masculinities, multiple-sexual-partners, and Aids
Lovestruck? Gender-based violence and the materiality of intimacy in the rural Eastern Cape
Is marriage a dying institution in South Africa? Exploring changes in marriage in the context of ilobolo payments
Contemporary functions of ilobolo (bridewealth) in urban South African Zulu society
The Bond of Education
The Kgalagari and the Jural Consequences of Marriage
Zulu bridewealth (ilobolo) and womanhood in South Africa
The Impact of Early New England Missionaries on Women's Roles in Zulu Culture
Les prestations matrimoniales
Construction et contestation des hiérarchies dans les échanges cérémoniels aux Comores (île de Mohéli)
Marriage, kinship and childcare in the aftermath of Aids
What would we be without our land and cattle
Is there anything more to say about Lobolo
Coping with ethnography
The modern family in social-anthropological perspective
Urban lobolo attitudes
Principles of anthropology
Handbook on race relations in South Africa.
A Scientific Theory of Culture
Race Problems in the New Africa
The Life of a South African Tribe1
Akan and Ga-Adangme Peoples of the Gold Coast
Gusii Bridewealth Law and Custom
Sudan Notes and Records
An Introduction to Social Anthropology
From Southwestern Journal of Anthropology
The Anatomy of Lango Religion and Groups
The Evolution of Culture
African Systems of Kinship and Marriage
| Citations per year | 0.24 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 1958 - 2026 (69) |
| Highly cited | No |