Negotiating mentoring relationships and support for Black and Brown early‐career faculty
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21392652 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Natalie King (0000-0002-4465-1409, Department of Middle and Secondary Education Georgia State University Atlanta Georgia USA, corresponding author), Bhupendra Upadhyay (0000-0001-5141-3778, Department of Middle and Secondary Education University of Minnesota Minneapolis Minnesota USA) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 106 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 1149-1171 |
| Publication date | 2022-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Science Education (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0036-8326 • E-ISSN: 1098-237X |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/sce.21755 |
| OpenAlex | W4284968018 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
| References cited | 51 |
In this essay, we share historical and structural components of mentoring within institutions of higher education and grapple with technical and moral obligations of support. We argue for more humanizing approaches that embed personal, social, and cultural aspects of mentoring, and seek to disrupt the purposes of mentoring, and for whom? Using a critical approach, we promote justice‐oriented and equity‐driven models of mentoring that account for excessive teaching loads and service commitments for faculty at minority‐serving institutions and Black and Brown faculty at predominantly White institutions. Current promotion and tenure publish or perish models neglect the intellectual and scholarly contributions made through teaching and service and therefore hold the same level of expectations for engagement in and dissemination of research. We share our own stories as Faculty of Color navigating institutional structures during the promotion and tenure process, while also negotiating incongruent cultures of our personal and professional lives. Furthermore, we address the need for mentoring and networking within exclusionary spaces to support the productivity and critical research agendas of Black and Brown faculty that often challenge the white heteronormative cultures of our institutions, professional organizations, peer‐reviewed journals, and prestigious funding mechanisms. Implications of this essay include an acknowledgment of oppressive systems that early‐career Black and Brown faculty often navigate and a call for diverse mentoring programs and supports that conform with and validate our lives and needs. Furthermore, we provide recommendations on evidence‐based resources and approaches that are available to science, technology, engineering, and mathematics faculty and science educators
Higher education · Mentorship · Negotiation · Pedagogy · Political science · Politics · Promotion (chess) · Public relations · Social science · Sociology · Career Development and Diversity · Higher Education Research Studies · Law · Mentoring and Academic Development
Women of Color in Academe
Marginalizing Merit?
(Un)Hidden Figures
Pathways to institutional transformation at HBCUs
Identity-informed mentoring to support acculturation of female faculty of color in higher education
An Investigation Into Mentoring Practices of Faculty Who Mentor Undergraduate Researchers at a Hispanic Serving Institution
The Role of Mentoring on Hispanic Graduate Students’ Sense of Belonging and Academic Self-Efficacy
Researching While Black (and Female)
Smiling Faces and Colored Spaces
How Black Engineering and Computing Faculty Exercise an Equity Ethic to Racially Fortify and Enrich Black Students
Seeking Tenure While Black
Surveillance and Sacrifice
Don’t Leave Us Behind”
Coloring the Academic Landscape
In a different voice
The Voices of Senior Scholars on Mentoring Graduate Students and Junior Scholars
Mentoring Experiences and Perceptions of Latino Male Faculty in Higher Education
Storytelling for Oppositionists and Others
Contributing Factors to Earning Tenure Among Black Male Counselor Educators
Mapping a Mentoring Roadmap and Developing a Supportive Network for Strategic Career Advancement
| Unique citing works | 6 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,5 |
| Citation span | 2022 - 2026 (5) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 5 |