Extending science instruction beyond the CER
Use of critical questions in the argumentation of middle school science students
Bibliographic Data
Critiquing arguments is important for K‐12 science students to learn but not emphasized by the predominant claim‐evidence‐reasoning (CER) argumentation model. Drawing on the work of Yu and Zenker (2020), and Dove and Nussbaum (2018), we developed a tool for supplementing CER with critical questions (CQs) from philosophy that cover most, if not all, the logical dimensions of argument critique. Six middle school science teachers designed lessons involving argumentation, including the use of CQs. We assessed the effects on student self‐efficacy for engaging in argument critique, teacher self‐efficacy for using argument pedagogy, and teachers’ perceptions of the value of CQs. Qualitative data included teacher interviews, lesson transcripts, and student work samples. Quantitative data included surveys of student self‐efficacy administered at the beginning and end of the school year. There was evidence suggesting an increase over time in students’ confidence for engaging in argument critique and teachers’ confidence with argument pedagogy. However, only four of the six teachers were confident and skilled enough to include CQs in their lessons. Those who did use CQs tended to perceive them as providing a helpful structure for critique, prompts for deeper thinking, and a tool for fostering critical classroom norms. Discussion of CQs may have benefitted students’ writing by promoting peer critique and encouragement to elaborate. Overall, CQs afford students with a framework for judging argument strength. Scientific argumentation involving CQs provides a more contemporary philosophical basis for scientific argumentation than CER or the Toulmin model as it emphasizes the critical and dialogic nature of science
Argumentation theory · Epistemology · Mathematics education · Next Generation Science Standards · Pedagogy · Philosophy of science · Science education · Sociology · Education and Critical Thinking Development · Educational Strategies and Epistemologies · Philosophy · Psychology · Science Education and Pedagogy
A Theory of Argument
A Dialogic Teaching Companion
Dialogic Education and Technology
Dialogue and the Development of Children's Thinking
Argumentation Schemes
Apprenticeship in Thinking
TAPping into argumentation
Toward a more dialogic pedagogy
The Icap Framework
Educational Implications of Choosing “Practice” to Describe Science in the Next Generation Science Standards
A learning progression for scientific argumentation
The Snowball Phenomenon
Grasp of evidence
Representing Student Argumentation as Functionally Emergent From Scientific Activity
Arguing to Learn in Science
The development and validation of a learning progression for argumentation in science
Productive Failure
Schemes, Critical Questions, and Complete Argument Evaluation
“We observed that the magnetic field is stronger than gravity”
The Effects of Writing on Learning in Science, Social Studies, and Mathematics
How effective is peer interaction in facilitating learning? A meta-analysis
Argumentation skills mediate the effect of peer argumentation on content knowledge in middle-school students
Learning to use benefit-cost arguments
The Evolution Of Social Cognitive Theory
Questions in Time
Supporting and Promoting Argumentation Discourse in Science Education
Qualitative research methods for the social sciences
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |