AI adoption in healthcare organizations
Spheres of development and the virtue of visible value
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21400644 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Rikke Duus (0000-0002-0086-6723, University College London, corresponding author), Mike Cooray (Hult International Business School), Simon Lilley (0000-0002-6754-8025), Simon John Lilley (University of Lincoln) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 226 |
| Pages | 124541 |
| Publication date | 2026-05-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Technological Forecasting and Social Change (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0040-1625 • E-ISSN: 1873-5509 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.techfore.2026.124541 |
| OpenAlex | W7128427326 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 56 |
Despite the significant potential of artificial intelligence (AI), many public healthcare organizations struggle to adopt this technology. Simultaneously, empirical research on the factors that influence AI adoption in public healthcare settings remains scarce. We address this gap with a qualitative study with senior healthcare leaders who hold responsibility for the adoption and development of AI-enabled solutions within two leading National Healthcare Service (NHS) Trusts in the United Kingdom. Drawing upon the Technology-Organization-Environment (TOE) framework to make sense of our findings, we reveal nine factors that influence AI adoption. Significantly, we buttress our use of the TOE framework by highlighting how each TOE context can evolve into a sphere of AI development and explore the positively mediating role of a meta-factor that we term ‘visible value’ in that process. Visible value can be explained as the demonstrated or executed positive impact relating to AI adoption activities, where the value can be vividly seen, experienced, agreed upon and, ideally, measured, and helps to drive momentum internally and/or with key external stakeholders. Generation of visible value helps to legitimize and build confidence in continued AI activities. We thus develop existing theoretical resources to advance practical understanding of AI adoption in public healthcare organizations
Development (topology) · Health care · SPHERES · Value (mathematics) · Virtue · AI in Service Interactions · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Predicting Intention to Adopt Interorganizational Linkages
Technological frames
Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research
Shaping the future of AI in healthcare through ethics and governance
Stealth assessment of creativity in a physics video game
Uncovering the potential of innovation ecosystems in the healthcare sector after the Covid-19 crisis
Unlocking the black box
An artificial intelligence (AI)-readiness and adoption framework for AgriTech firms
Will artificial intelligence drive the advancements in higher education? A tri-phased exploration
Technological paradoxes and artificial intelligence implementation in healthcare. An application of paradox theory
Healthcare workers' adoption of and satisfaction with artificial intelligence
Shifting attitudes and trust in AI
Skills or degree? The rise of skill-based hiring for AI and green jobs
Towards an experiential ethics of AI and robots
Digital transformation in healthcare
Navigating AI unpredictability
Putting the ‘theory’ back into grounded theory
We're implementing AI now, so why not ask us what to do? - How AI providers perceive and navigate the spread of diagnostic AI in complex healthcare systems
Bodies, Technologies and Action Possibilities
| Highly cited | No |
|---|