Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Restoring consumer trust in e-commerce

The role of blockchain technology and its behavioral implications

Bibliographic Data

ID21402665
AuthorsLouisa Uchikoshi (Waseda University), Björn Frank (0000-0003-3047-6504, Waseda University, corresponding author)
Year2026
Volume224
Pages124495
Publication date2026-03-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueTechnological Forecasting and Social Change (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0040-1625 • E-ISSN: 1873-5509
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.techfore.2025.124495
OpenAlexW7117298184
LanguageEN
References cited64

Blockchain technology has unique technological features that could help e-commerce firms regain consumer trust lost due to widespread online fraud. However, their effectiveness and underlying mechanisms remain unknown. Drawing on trust formation theory, this article examines the effectiveness of these blockchain technology features and its variation across consumer needs. A multi-method approach combines a randomized between-subjects experiment (Study 1: 727 consumers; pretest: 45) and a multi-wave survey of actual experiences of tech-savvy consumers (Study 2: 563 consumers; pretest: 30) in the U.S. Consistent statistically significant results show that the blockchain technology features of privacy ownership, privacy monetization, and metadata transparency increase consumer trust in e-commerce platforms. The openness of a blockchain platform to criminal sellers, which allows consumers to access illicit products, increases trust only for consumers with illicit purchase needs, while decreasing trust for consumers without such needs. Trust mediates the effects of these blockchain technology features on consumers' willingness to pay additional fees and retail use intentions, which in turn mediate the effects on actual future retail use behavior. These findings extend trust formation theory to the context of blockchain technology and inform retail practitioners of a powerful new technology for increasing consumer purchases in their online stores. • This research explores the mechanisms of trust formation in blockchain e-commerce. • Privacy ownership, monetization, and metadata transparency increase consumer trust. • Illicit access increases trust among consumers with illicit purchase needs. • Illicit access decreases trust among consumers without illicit purchase needs. • Use intentions mediate the effect of trust on actual use behavior

Blockchain · Consumer behaviour · Consumer privacy · Context (archaeology) · Openness to experience · Sharing economy · Transparency (behavior) · Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies · Privacy, Security, and Data Protection · Technology Adoption and User Behaviour

  • Method Variance and Marker Variables

    Open Access•Larry J Williams, Nathan S Hartman et al.•Organizational Research Methods•2010

  • Sex, Drugs, and Bitcoin

    Open Access•Sean Foley, Jonathan R Karlsen et al.•Review of Financial Studies•2019

  • Developing and Validating Trust Measures for e-Commerce

    D Harrison McKnight, Vivek Choudhury et al.•Information Systems Research•2002

  • Collinearity, Power, and Interpretation of Multiple Regression Analysis

    Open Access•Charlotte H Mason, William D Perreault•Journal of Marketing Research•1991

  • An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust

    F David Schoorman, Robert C Mayer et al.•Academy of Management Review•2007

  • An Updated Guideline for Assessing Discriminant Validity

    Open Access•Mikko Rönkkö, Eunseong Cho•Organizational Research Methods•2022

  • Building consumer trust online

    Open Access•Donna L Hoffman, Thomas P Novak et al.•Communications of the ACM•1999

  • Trust and TAM in Online Shopping

    David Gefen, Elena Karahanna et al.•MIS Quarterly•2003

  • Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology

    Viswanath Venkatesh, Venkatesh Venkatesh et al.•MIS Quarterly•2012

  • Common method biases in behavioral research

    Philip M Podsakoff, Scott B Mackenzie et al.•Journal of Applied Psychology•2003

  • Amazon's Mechanical Turk

    Open Access•Michael D Buhrmester, Michael Buhrmester et al.•Perspectives on Psychological…•2011

  • An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust

    Robert C Mayer, Roger C Mayer et al.•Academy of Management Review•1995

  • The role of trust as the facilitator and contingency factor in the adoption of digital healthcare services

    Open Access•Phatthira Wissawaswaengsuk, Prashant Kumar et al.•Computers in Human Behavior•2025

  • Blockchain technology and trust relationships in trade finance

    Open Access•Michał Kowalski, Zach W Y Lee et al.•Technological Forecasting and…•2021

  • Consumer preferences for artificial intelligence-enhanced products

    Open Access•Björn Frank•Technological Forecasting and…•2024

  • Risk prediction and credibility detection of network public opinion using blockchain technology

    Open Access•Zeyu Wang, Shuting Zhang et al.•Technological Forecasting and…•2023

  • Blockchain application and collaborative innovation in the manufacturing industry

    Open Access•Yinglin Wan, Yuchen Gao et al.•Technological Forecasting and…•2022

  • The AI-extended consumer

    Open Access•Björn Frank, Boris Herbas-Torrico et al.•Technological Forecasting and…•2021

  • Trust in a ‘trust-free’ system

    Open Access•QingQiu Gan, Raymond Y K Lau•Technological Forecasting and…•2024

  • Trust in the Internet as an experience technology

    William H Dutton, Adrian Shepherd et al.•Information Communication & Society•2006

  • An Analysis of Data Quality

    Jeremy Kees, Christopher Berry et al.•Journal of Advertising•2017

  • Own Data? Ethical Reflections on Data Ownership

    Open Access•Patrik Hummel, Matthias Braun et al.•Philosophy & Technology•2021

  • Trust in the world of cybercrime

    Jonathan Lusthaus•Global Crime•2012

  • Toward a detailed understanding of illegal digital downloading intentions

    Open Access•Xiao Wang, Steven McClung et al.•New Media & Society•2011

  • Assessing citizens' behavior towards blockchain cryptocurrency adoption in the Mano River Union States

    Open Access•Jonathan Koroma, Rongting Zhou et al.•Technology in Society•2022

  • In Blockchain We Trust

    Open Access•Doh Shin, Donghee Shin et al.•Social Science Quarterly•2020

  • Dark Knowledge and Platform Governance

    Open Access•K Hazel Kwon, Chun Shao•American Behavioral Scientist•2021

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae