Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Rank information and inequality in social welfare functions

Bibliographic Data

ID21405127
AuthorsAndreas Darmann (0000-0002-0477-4578, University of Graz), Daniel Eckert (Graz University of Technology), Christian Klamler (0000-0003-1225-5943, Graz University of Technology, corresponding author)
Year2025
Volume98
Issue4
Pages473-487
Publication date2025-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueTheory and Decision (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0040-5833 • E-ISSN: 1573-7187
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s11238-025-10023-5
OpenAlexW4407635302
LanguageEN
References cited9

In this paper we use rank information to construct a measure of preference satisfaction by collective decision rules and to compare the Borda rule with the plurality rule with respect to the inequality their outcome induces. While the construction of our measure of preference satisfaction is formally equivalent to Borda utilities, it turns out that, with respect to equality, the Borda rule is not necessarily superior to plurality rule for the case of more than three alternatives

Combinatorics · Econometrics · Economics · Inequality · Mathematical economics · Political science · Rank (graph theory) · Social inequality · Social Welfare · Welfare · Welfare economics · Game Theory and Voting Systems · Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics · Income, Poverty, and Inequality · Mathematics

  • Inequality Reexamined

    Amartya Sen•Inequality reexamined•1995

  • Degrees of Preference and Degrees of Preference Satisfaction

    Open Access•Mauro Rossi•Utilitas•2011

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae