‘The First Act of Hostility’
Beverley’s Part in the Trial of Charles I
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21421181 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Barbara English (University of Hull, Hull, UK, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 92 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 115-130 |
| Publication date | 2020-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Yorkshire Archaeological Journal (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0084-4276 • E-ISSN: 2045-0664 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/00844276.2020.1780080 |
| OpenAlex | W3040115704 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 6 |
The trial of King Charles I has in the last twenty years been discussed by many scholars. Much less attention has been paid to the evidence of the 33 witnesses summoned to the Westminster Court, yet what they said was the basis of the charges against the king. The first witness, William Cuthbert, was a Yorkshireman from Hull Bridge, Beverley. While the king and royalists alleged that the ‘hostilities’ of the Civil Wars had begun at the Beverley Gate, Hull, this prosecution witness claimed that the breaking, entering and possession of his house near Beverley was ‘the first act of hostility that was committed in those parts.’
Criminology · Hostility · Political science · Possession (linguistics) · Sociology · Witness · Historical Economic and Social Studies · History · Law · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology
| Highly cited | No |
|---|