Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Risk-Need-Responsivity Meets Mental Health

Implementation Challenges in Probation Case Planning

Bibliographic Data

ID21424769
AuthorsGina M Vincent (0000-0002-9315-9584, corresponding author), Rachael T Perrault (0000-0001-6695-2643, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School), Dara C Drawbridge (0000-0002-7111-8634, Fitchburg State University), Gretchen O Landry (William James College), G Landry (William James College), Thomas Grisso (0000-0002-2241-3418, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School)
Year2021
Volume48
Issue9
Pages1187-1207
Publication date2021-09-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueCriminal Justice and Behavior (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0093-8548 • E-ISSN: 1552-3594
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/00938548211008491
OpenAlexW3153782127
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited36

This study examined the feasibility of and fidelity to risk/needs assessment, mental health screening, and risk-need-responsivity (RNR)-based case planning within juvenile probation in two states. The researcher-guided implementation effort included the Massachusetts Youth Screening Instrument-2 (MAYSI-2), Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY), and policies to prioritize criminogenic needs while using mental health services only when warranted. Data from 53 probation officers (POs) and 553 youths indicated three of five offices had high fidelity to administration and case planning policies. The interrater reliability ( n = 85; intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] [A, 1] = .92 [Northern state] and .80 [Southern state]) and predictive validity ( n = 455; Exp[B] = 1.83) of SAVRY risk ratings were significant. There was an overreliance on mental health services; 48% of youth received these referrals when only 20% screened as having mental health needs. Barriers to fidelity to RNR practices in some offices included assessments not being conducted before disposition, lack of service availability, and limited buy-in from a few stakeholders

Computer security · Developmental psychology · Environmental health · Fidelity · Injury prevention · Inter-rater reliability · Intraclass correlation · Mental health · Needs assessment · Occupational safety and health · Poison control · Political science · Psychiatry · Psychometrics · Rating scale · Risk assessment · Suicide prevention · Applied Psychology · Clinical Psychology · Computer Science · Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis · Engineering · Health Policy Implementation Science · Human Factors and Ergonomics · Medicine · Psychology · Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending

  • Predicting violence in female forensic inpatients with substance use disorders – the utility of a gender-responsive assessment

    Open Access•Viviane Wolf, Juliane Mayer et al.•Frontiers in Psychiatry•2024

  • Needing More Guidance

    Jenna L Borseth•Corrections•2021

  • Screening, service provision, and information sharing practices of juvenile facilities

    Open Access•D Michael Applegarth, Benjamin Adams•Children and Youth Services Review•2023

  • Serious and Violent Juvenile Offenders

    David P Farrington, Rolf Loeber•Serious and Violent Juvenile…•1998

  • Applied Survival Analysis

    Open Access•David W Hosmer, Stanley Lemeshow et al.•Applied Survival Analysis•2008

  • Correctional policy for offenders with mental illness

    Jennifer L Skeem, Sarah Manchak et al.•Law and Human Behavior•2011

  • Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients.

    Kenneth O Mcgraw, Senya Wong et al.•Psychological Methods•1996

  • Psychiatric Disorder, Comorbidity, and Suicidal Behavior in Juvenile Justice Youth

    Open Access•Gail A Wasserman, Larkin S McReynolds et al.•Criminal Justice and Behavior•2010

  • Risk Assessment With Young Offenders

    Open Access•Mark E Olver, Keira C Stockdale et al.•Criminal Justice and Behavior•2009

  • A comparative study of violence risk assessment tools

    Open Access•Jay P Singh, Martin Grann et al.•Clinical Psychology Review•2011

  • A conceptual framework for implementation fidelity

    Open Access•Christopher Carroll, Malcolm Patterson et al.•Implementation Science•2007

  • Misalignment in Supervision

    Open Access•Jill Viglione, Danielle S Rudes et al.•Criminal Justice and Behavior•2015

  • Diffusion of Innovations in Service Organizations

    Open Access•Trisha Greenhalgh, Glenn Robert et al.•Milbank Quarterly•2004

  • Reforming Juvenile Justice

    National Research Council, Assessing Juvenile Justice Reform Committee et al.•Reforming Juvenile Justice•2013

  • Early Predictors of Adolescent Aggression and Adult Violence

    David P Farrington•Violence and Victims•1989

  • Psychiatric Disorders in Youth in Juvenile Detention

    Linda A Teplin, Karen M Abram et al.•Archives of General Psychiatry•2002

  • Finding the right focus

    Jacqueline Bosker, Cilia Witteman•Psychology Public Policy and Law•2016

  • Structured decision making in juvenile justice

    Open Access•Jeffrey J Shook, Rosemary C Sarri•Children and Youth Services Review•2007

  • Impact of risk/needs assessment on juvenile probation officers' decision making

    Gina M Vincent, Melissa L Paiva-Salisbury et al.•Psychology Public Policy and Law•2012

  • Rehabilitating criminal justice policy and practice

    D A Andrews, James Bonta•Psychology Public Policy and Law•2010

Citations per year0.6
Citation span2021 - 2024 (4)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae