Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Measuring Adaptive Functioning in a Correctional Setting

An Analysis of the Problems in Everyday Living Test (Pedl)

Bibliographic Data

ID21424929
AuthorsMaria Aparcero (0000-0002-5614-4949, Fordham University, corresponding author), Hyunjung Lee (0000-0003-0783-5484, Fordham University), Charity Wijetunga (The University of North Carolina School of Medicine), Erin M Conley (Fordham University), Bryn Rosenfeld (0000-0003-1399-2777, Fordham University), Heining Cham (0000-0002-2933-056X, Fordham University)
Year2024
Volume51
Issue12
Pages1838-1858
Publication date2024-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueCriminal Justice and Behavior (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0093-8548 • E-ISSN: 1552-3594
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/00938548241268135
OpenAlexW4401682744
LanguageEN
References cited38

Identifying incarcerated individuals with poor adaptive functioning (AF) is critical to ensuring their safety and preserving their legal rights, particularly when a diagnosis of intellectual disability (ID) is considered. This study examined the utility of the Problems in Everyday Living Test (PEDL) to identify incarcerated individuals with deficits in AF who may warrant further assessment for ID. The sample consisted of 154 incarcerated adults housed in mental health units in a large urban jail. Latent class analysis supported a three-class model consistent with Impaired, Borderline, and Intact groups, which differed in the level of AF and other indicators of ID. A cutoff score of 13 in the PEDL was optimal to identify incarcerated individuals with deficits in AF, possible intellectual impairment, and a history of special education. Study findings provided preliminary support for using a 12-item modified version of the PEDL as a screening tool in correctional settings

Borderline intellectual functioning · Cognition · Intellectual disability · Latent class model · Mental health · Psychiatry · Test (biology) · Clinical Psychology · Down syndrome and intellectual disability research · Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints · Psychology · Schizophrenia research and treatment

  • Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

    American Psychiatric Association American Psychiatric Association, Ewer Ewer•Diagnostic And Statistical Manual…•2013

  • Latent Class Analysis and Finite Mixture Modeling

    Katherine E Masyn•Quantitative Methods Vol. 2•2013

  • Latent Class Analysis With Distal Outcomes

    Stephanie T Lanza, Xianming Tan et al.•Structural Equation Modeling: A…•2013

  • Deciding on the Number of Classes in Latent Class Analysis and Growth Mixture Modeling

    Karen Nylund‐gibson, Karen L Nylund et al.•Structural Equation Modeling: A…•2007

  • Ten frequently asked questions about latent class analysis.

    Open Access•Karen Nylund‐gibson, Andrew Young Choi•Translational Issues in…•2018

  • A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research

    Open Access•Terry K Koo, Mae Y Li•Journal of Chiropractic Medicine•2016

  • Auxiliary Variables in Mixture Modeling

    Tihomir Asparouhov, Bengt Muthén•Structural Equation Modeling: A…•2014

  • A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales

    Open Access•Jacob Cohen•Educational and Psychological…•1960

  • Validity, interrater reliability, and measures of adaptive behavior

    Karen L Salekin, Tess M S Neal et al.•Psychology Public Policy and Law•2017

  • Estimating Latent Structure Models with Categorical Variables

    Open Access•Annabel Bolck, Marcel A Croon et al.•Political Analysis•2004

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae