Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Identifying the response process validity of clinical vignette-type multiple choice questions

An eye-tracking study

Bibliographic Data

ID21447698
AuthorsFrancisco Carlos Specian Junior (0000-0002-4220-2642, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), corresponding author), Thiago Martins Santos (0000-0002-3595-4088, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)), John Sandars (0000-0003-3930-387X, Health Research Institute, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK), Eliana Martorano Amaral (0000-0001-9151-3108, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)), Dario Cecilio-Fernandes (0000-0002-8746-1680, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP))
Year2023
Volume45
Issue8
Pages845-851
Publication date2023-08-03
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueMedical Teacher (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0142-159X • E-ISSN: 1466-187X
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/0142159x.2023.2182662
PMID36840707
OpenAlexW4321996949
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited36

Introduction Clinical vignette-type multiple choice questions (CV-MCQs) are widely used in assessment and identifying the response process validity (RPV) of questions with low and high integration of knowledge is essential. Answering CV-MCQs of different levels of knowledge application and integration can be understood from a cognitive workload perspective and this can be identified by using eye-tracking. The aim of the pilot study was to identify the cognitive workload and RPV of CV-MCQs of different levels of knowledge application and integration by the use eye-tracking.Methods Fourteen fourth-year medical students answered a test with 40 CV-MCQs, which were equally divided into low-level and high-level complexity (knowledge application and integration). Cognitive workload was measured using screen-based eye tracking, with the number of fixations and revisitations for each area of interest.Results We found a higher cognitive workload for high-level complexity (M = 121.74) compared with lower-level complexity questions (M = 51.94) and also for participants who answered questions incorrectly (M = 94.31) compared with correctly (M = 79.36).Conclusion Eye-tracking has the potential to become a useful and practical approach for helping to identify the RPV of CV-MCQs. This approach can be used for improving the design and development of CV-MCQs, and to provide feedback to inform teaching and learning.Practice pointsClinical vignette- type multiple choice questions (CV-MCQs) are widely used in assessment.Identifying the response process validity (RPV) of CV-MCQs with low and high complexity is essential.Low and high complexity CV-MCQs have different cognitive workloads that can be practically identified using eye-tracking.Eye-tracking has the potential for identifying the RPV of CV-MCQs

Cognition · Eye tracking · Multiple choice · Pedagogy · Psychiatry · Tracking (education) · Vignette · Workload · Artificial Intelligence · Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills · Computer Science · Innovations in Medical Education · Internal Medicine · Medicine · Psychology · Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare · Social Psychology

  • ‘Key findings’, ‘key features’ and ‘key clinical decisions’ in clinical reasoning assessment

    Valerie Lang, Jennifer Readlynn et al.•Medical Teacher•2023

  • Comparison of cognitive workload between very short answer questions and multiple-choice questions

    Open Access•Maria Gabriela Carneiro Queiroz, Francisco Carlos Specian Junior et al.•Medical Education Online•2026

  • Multiple Comparisons among Means

    Olive Jean Dunn•Journal of the American…•1961

  • Current Concepts in Validity and Reliability for Psychometric Instruments

    Open Access•Donald A Cook, David A Cook et al.•The American Journal of Medicine•2006

  • Generalized Eta and Omega Squared Statistics

    Stephen Olejnik, James Algina•Psychological Methods•2003

  • A theory of reading

    Marcel Adam Just, Patricia A Carpenter•Psychological Review•1980

  • When I say … response process validity evidence

    Open Access•Sneha Shankar, Christina St‐onge et al.•Medical Education•2022

  • A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy

    David R Krathwohl•Theory Into Practice•2002

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0,67
Citation span2023 - 2026 (4)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae