Twelve tips for applying the think-aloud method to capture cognitive processes
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21448706 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Babu Noushad (0000-0003-1482-9939, Maastricht University, corresponding author), Pascal W M Van Gerven (0000-0002-8363-2534, Maastricht University), Anique B H De Bruin (0000-0001-5178-0287, Maastricht University) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 46 |
| Issue | 7 |
| Pages | 892-897 |
| Publication date | 2024-07-02 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Medical Teacher (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0142-159X • E-ISSN: 1466-187X |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/0142159x.2023.2289847 |
| PMID | 38071621 |
| OpenAlex | W4389520876 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 17 |
| References cited | 56 |
The think-aloud method is an established technique for studying human thought (cognitive) processes. Problem-solving and decision-making are essential skills for medical professionals, and the cognitive processes underlying these skills are complex. Studying these thought processes would enable educators, clinicians, and researchers to modify or refine their approaches and interventions. The think-aloud method has been utilized for capturing cognitive processes in a variety of fields, including computer usability, sports and cognitive psychology. Medical education also recognizes thought processes as valuable data for research and education. This article aims to guide researchers and educators through the preparation and implementation of a think-aloud method to record participants' thought processes during an activity
Cognition · Medical education · Pedagogy · Think aloud protocol · Usability · Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills · Computer Science · Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences · Medicine · Psychology · Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
A multi-phase approach for developing a conceptual model and preliminary content for patient-reported outcome measurement in TKA patients
Exploring young learners’ prompted and unprompted SRL think-alouds
TAP express
Effects of just-in-time inquiry prompts and principle-based self-explanation guidance on learning and use of domain texts in simulation-based inquiry learning
From social to informational exclusion
The risk of occupational anaphylaxis in beekeepers
Teachers’ Attitudes Toward Inclusion and the ICF
Item Processing Patterns of Test-Takers in a Multiple-Choice Reading Comprehension Test
Exploring early career academic teacher identities
Leveraging everyday mobile communication platforms for inclusive and accessible user studies
The power of seeing less
Chinese learners’ choices and pragmatic awareness of Japanese formality
Can ChatGPT serve as a writing collaborator? Insights from Chinese EFL learners
Kindergarten teachers’ changes in practice in interactive book reading following professional development primarily using in-class modeling
Investigating the Decision-making Style of Translation Raters in Large-scale Language Tests
Using think-aloud methods to investigate inter- and intra-individual differences in reading processes
Birthday memories
The Think-Aloud Controversy in Second Language Research
Protocol Analysis
The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance
Human Memory
Verbal reports as data.
The Use of Think-aloud Methods in Qualitative Research An Introduction to Think-aloud Methods
What is an adequate sample size? Operationalising data saturation for theory-based interview studies
The validity of verbal protocols
Telling more than we can know
The Think-Aloud Method for Evaluating the Usability of a Regional Atlas
Towards a fuller picture
An outcomes research perspective on medical education
Using the think aloud protocol in health professions education
The think aloud method
Think-aloud protocols in research on essay rating
Evaluation of an Electronic Medical Record Module for Nursing Documentation in Paediatric Palliative Care
The use of composite time trade-off and discrete choice experiment methods for the valuation of the Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (SWEMWBS)
Evaluating Bang for the Buck
Is Thinking Aloud Reactive When Writing in the Heritage Language
Reconceptualizing Reactivity of Think-Alouds and Eye Tracking
Think-Aloud Technique and Protocol Analysis in Clinical Decision-Making Research
Do procedures for verbal reporting of thinking have to be reactive? A meta-analysis and recommendations for best reporting methods
How to Study Thinking in Everyday Life
How Many Interviews Are Enough
| Citations per year | 8.5 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Highly cited | No |