Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Why don't you do what you said you would? Conversational strategies for agents to understand users' reasons in supporting behavior

Bibliographic Data

ID21452912
AuthorsPei‐Yu Chen (0000-0003-2793-2361, Delft University of Technology, corresponding author), Pei-Yu Chen (Delft University of Technology), M Birna van Riemsdijk (0000-0001-9089-5271, University of Twente), Dirk Heylen (0000-0003-4288-3334, University of Twente), Dirk K J Heylen (University of Twente), Catholijn M Jonker (0000-0003-4780-7461, Delft University of Technology), Myrthe L Tielman (0000-0002-7826-5821, Delft University of Technology)
Year2025
Pages1-20
Publication date2025-04-17
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueBehaviour and Information Technology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0144-929X • E-ISSN: 1362-3001
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/0144929x.2025.2483793
OpenAlexW4409523802
LanguageEN
References cited55

Effective support from personal assistive technologies relies on accurate user models that capture user values, preferences, and context. Knowledge-based techniques model these relationships, enabling support agents to align their actions with user values. However, understanding values in a single context is insufficient due to the dynamic nature of behaviour. This study explores the use of dialogue strategies to update user models. Participants were randomly assigned to different strategies and they discussed one randomly chosen non-adherence situation with the agent. Then, their emotions, acquired information accuracy, completeness, and dialogue experience were rated. Our findings suggest that multiple-choice dialogues may limit response depth, reducing the perceived completeness of behaviour reasons. In contrast, open-ended questions allow more detailed input but require more time and effort, potentially worsening the dialogue experience. Through inductive coding, we identified key topics, such as individual challenges, priorities, tangible outcomes, and values, essential for constructing personalised user models. We also analyzed conversation paths to improve dialogue-based user model updates in support agents. Further research is needed to refine the relationship between dialogue strategies and self-conscious emotions, considering diverse backgrounds and health goals, while enhancing dialogue design

Internet privacy · World Wide Web · AI in Service Interactions · Computer Science · Psychology · Psychology of Social Influence · Social Robot Interaction and HRI

  • Social values and social change

    Lynn R Kahle•Social values and social change•1983

  • Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems

    Open Access•Mica R Endsley•Human Factors: The Journal of the…•1995

  • A meta-analysis of computer-tailored interventions for health behavior change

    Open Access•Paul Krebs, James O Prochaska et al.•Preventive Medicine•2010

  • Of Mice, Men, and Trolleys

    Open Access•Dries H Bostyn, Sybren Sevenhant et al.•Psychological Science•2018

  • Translating Values into Design Requirements

    I Van De Poel•Philosophy and Engineering•2013

  • A Meta-Analysis of Web-Delivered Tailored Health Behavior Change Interventions

    Mia Liza A Lustria, Seth M Noar et al.•Journal of Health Communication•2013

  • Ladderbot—A conversational agent for human-like online laddering interviews

    Open Access•Tim Rietz, Alexander Maedche•International Journal of…•2023

  • Value Sensitive Design and Information Systems

    Open Access•Batya Friedman, Peter H Kahn et al.•Early Engagement and New…•2013

  • Randomised controlled trial of an automated, interactive telephone intervention (TLC Diabetes) to improve type 2 diabetes management

    Open Access•Emily D Williams, Dominique Bird et al.•BMC Public Health•2012

  • Authentic and hubristic pride

    Open Access•Charles S Carver, Sungchoon Sinclair et al.•Journal of Research in Personality•2010

  • Persons and situations in the moral domain

    Open Access•Patrick L Hill, Daniel K Lapsley•Journal of Research in Personality•2009

  • A structural equation test of the value-attitude-behavior hierarchy

    Pamela M Homer, Lynn R Kahle•Journal of Personality and Social…•1988

  • Together or apart

    Ayelet Fishbach, Ying Zhang•Journal of Personality and Social…•2008

  • Target Article

    Jessica L Tracy, Richard W Robins•Psychological Inquiry•2004

  • An Overview of the Schwartz Theory of Basic Values

    Open Access•Shalom H Schwartz•Online Readings in Psychology and…•2012

  • Demonstrating Rigor Using Thematic Analysis

    Open Access•Jennifer Fereday, Eimear Muir-Cochrane•International Journal of…•2006

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae