Why don't you do what you said you would? Conversational strategies for agents to understand users' reasons in supporting behavior
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21452912 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Pei‐Yu Chen (0000-0003-2793-2361, Delft University of Technology, corresponding author), Pei-Yu Chen (Delft University of Technology), M Birna van Riemsdijk (0000-0001-9089-5271, University of Twente), Dirk Heylen (0000-0003-4288-3334, University of Twente), Dirk K J Heylen (University of Twente), Catholijn M Jonker (0000-0003-4780-7461, Delft University of Technology), Myrthe L Tielman (0000-0002-7826-5821, Delft University of Technology) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Pages | 1-20 |
| Publication date | 2025-04-17 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Behaviour and Information Technology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0144-929X • E-ISSN: 1362-3001 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/0144929x.2025.2483793 |
| OpenAlex | W4409523802 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 55 |
Effective support from personal assistive technologies relies on accurate user models that capture user values, preferences, and context. Knowledge-based techniques model these relationships, enabling support agents to align their actions with user values. However, understanding values in a single context is insufficient due to the dynamic nature of behaviour. This study explores the use of dialogue strategies to update user models. Participants were randomly assigned to different strategies and they discussed one randomly chosen non-adherence situation with the agent. Then, their emotions, acquired information accuracy, completeness, and dialogue experience were rated. Our findings suggest that multiple-choice dialogues may limit response depth, reducing the perceived completeness of behaviour reasons. In contrast, open-ended questions allow more detailed input but require more time and effort, potentially worsening the dialogue experience. Through inductive coding, we identified key topics, such as individual challenges, priorities, tangible outcomes, and values, essential for constructing personalised user models. We also analyzed conversation paths to improve dialogue-based user model updates in support agents. Further research is needed to refine the relationship between dialogue strategies and self-conscious emotions, considering diverse backgrounds and health goals, while enhancing dialogue design
Internet privacy · World Wide Web · AI in Service Interactions · Computer Science · Psychology · Psychology of Social Influence · Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Social values and social change
Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems
A meta-analysis of computer-tailored interventions for health behavior change
Of Mice, Men, and Trolleys
Translating Values into Design Requirements
A Meta-Analysis of Web-Delivered Tailored Health Behavior Change Interventions
Ladderbot—A conversational agent for human-like online laddering interviews
Value Sensitive Design and Information Systems
Randomised controlled trial of an automated, interactive telephone intervention (TLC Diabetes) to improve type 2 diabetes management
Authentic and hubristic pride
Persons and situations in the moral domain
A structural equation test of the value-attitude-behavior hierarchy
Together or apart
Target Article
An Overview of the Schwartz Theory of Basic Values
Demonstrating Rigor Using Thematic Analysis
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |