When Objective Ambivalence Predicts Subjective Ambivalence
An Affect–Cognition Matching Perspective
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21453479 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Wei Jie Reiner Ng (0000-0002-8223-2563, National University of Singapore, Singapore, corresponding author), Ya Hui Michelle See (0000-0002-6772-982X, National University of Singapore, Singapore), Laura E Wallace (0000-0002-2298-7569, George Mason University) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 49 |
| Issue | 10 |
| Pages | 1495-1510 |
| Publication date | 2023-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0146-1672 • E-ISSN: 1552-7433 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/01461672221102015 |
| PMID | 35819181 |
| OpenAlex | W4285077299 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 67 |
Understanding when people are likely to feel ambivalent is important, as ambivalence is associated with key attitude outcomes, such as attitude-behavior consistency. Interestingly, the presence of conflicting positive and negative reactions (objective ambivalence) is weakly related to feeling conflicted (subjective ambivalence). We tested a novel situation that can influence the correspondence between objective and subjective ambivalence: whether a message and a recipient’s topic match in affective versus cognitive orientation. When a person encounters a message with an affective or cognitive match to the topic, conflicting reactions may be more accessible, increasing feelings of ambivalence. Across five studies, greater objective–subjective ambivalence correspondence occurred with an affective–cognitive match between message and topic orientation. Studies 4 and 5 also demonstrated that this primarily occurred when the message was counterattitudinal. This work contributes to the literature explaining the gap between measures of objective and subjective ambivalence as well as how messages can influence attitude strength properties
Affect (linguistics) · Ambivalence · Cognition · Consistency (knowledge bases) · Feeling · Perspective (graphical) · Behavioral Health and Interventions · Communication · Cultural Differences and Values · Psychology · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Psychology
Emotional influences on food choice
Measuring the Affective and Cognitive Properties of Attitudes
The ABC of Ambivalence
Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1
The weirdest people in the world?
Cognitive-Affective Inconsistency and Ambivalence
To Partition or Not to Partition Evaluative Judgments
Reducing Subjective Ambivalence by Creating Doubt
The gradual threshold model of ambivalence
Ambivalence and Attitudes
Attitudinal Ambivalence
The interactive effects of ambivalence and certainty on political opinion stability
Immunization status and sociodemographic characteristics
When message tailoring backfires
Beyond attitudinal ambivalence
Is affective material in attitudes more accessible than cognitive material? The moderating role of attitude basis
The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory
Where does moral conviction fit
The role of perceived attitudinal bases on spontaneous and requested advocacy
Ambivalence and Persuasion
Wanting other attitudes
Cognitive and Affective Bases of Attitudes toward Social Groups and Social Policies
Ambivalence and decisional conflict as a cause of psychological discomfort
When dueling emotions and conflicting beliefs predict subjective ambivalence
Ambivalence, discomfort, and motivated information processing
The role of attitude objects in attitude functions
The impact of affective and cognitive focus on attitude formation
Ambivalence, Uncertainty, and Processes of Candidate Evaluation
Effects of affective and cognitive focus on the attitude–behavior relation
Thinking and caring about cognitive inconsistency
What doesn't kill me makes me stronger
Can people feel happy and sad at the same time
Affective and cognitive meta-bases of attitudes
The good and bad of ambivalence
Culture, dialectics, and reasoning about contradiction
The need for cognition
Affective Focus Increases the Concordance Between Implicit and Explicit Attitudes
Culture Moderates the Pliability of Ambivalent Attitudes
Whence Univalent Ambivalence? From the Anticipation of Conflicting Reactions
Can Mixed Emotions Peacefully Coexist
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |