Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Disparate impact of risk assessment instruments

A systematic review

Bibliographic Data

ID21455183
AuthorsSpencer G Lawson (0000-0002-9572-169X, Health Advances (United States)), Emma L Narkewicz (0009-0003-6199-2648, Health Advances (United States)), Gina M Vincent (0000-0002-9315-9584, Health Advances (United States))
Year2024
Volume48
Issue5-6
Pages427-440
Publication date2024-10-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueLaw and Human Behavior (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0147-7307 • E-ISSN: 1573-661X
PublisherAmerican Psychological Association (APA) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1037/lhb0000582
PMID39347719
OpenAlexW4402987284
LanguageEN
Citations received2

OBJECTIVE: One concern about the use of risk assessment instruments in legal decisions is the potential for disparate impact by race or ethnicity. This means that one racial or ethnic group will experience harsher legal outcomes than another because of higher or biased risk estimates. We conducted a systematic review of the literature to synthesize research examining the real-world impact of juvenile and adult risk instruments on racial/ethnic disparities in legal decision making. HYPOTHESES: Given the nature of research synthesis, we did not test formal hypotheses. METHOD: Our systematic literature search as of July 2023 identified 21 articles that investigated the disparate impact of 13 risk assessment instruments on various legal outcomes. Most of these instruments were actuarial pretrial screening instruments. RESULTS: Our narrative synthesis indicated that there is not strong evidence of risk instruments contributing to greater system disparity. Ten articles indicated that adopting risk instruments did not create (or exacerbate preexisting) disparities, and eight articles found that instrument use reduced disparities in legal decision making. Three articles reported evidence of disparate impact of risk instruments; only one of these studies received a strong study quality assessment score. We observed a scarcity of high-quality articles that employed what we deem to be the gold standard approach for examining the disparate impact of risk instruments (i.e., pretest-posttest design). CONCLUSIONS: The evidence signals that risk instruments can contribute to reductions in disparities across multiple stages of legal decision making. Yet study quality remains low, and most research has been conducted on decisions during the pretrial stage. More rigorous research on disparate impact across diverse legal decision points and approaches to risk assessment is needed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved)

Legal psychology · MEDLINE · Political science · Risk assessment · Systematic review · Applied Psychology · Computer Science · Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare · Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues · Psychology · Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending · Social Psychology

  • A pretrial release policy based on risk assessment would reduce unnecessary incarceration, increase racial fairness, and save money

    Open Access•Jennifer L Skeem, Lina Montoya et al.•Criminology & Public Policy•2026

  • Hiding Injustice

    Open Access•Tim Goddard, Myah Havertong et al.•Race and Justice•2026

Citations per year2
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae