Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Spanish [ auto + V + se ] constructions

Bibliographic Data

ID21463271
AuthorsVerónica Orqueda (0000-0003-0765-2928, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, corresponding author), Silvana Arriagada (0000-0001-6541-4296, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile), Fabian Toro (0009-0005-0736-0556, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile), Francisca Toro (Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile)
Year2020
Volume54
Issue3
Pages615-645
Publication date2020-09-25
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueFolia Linguistica (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0165-4004 • E-ISSN: 1614-7308
PublisherWalter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.1515/flin-2020-2049
OpenAlexW4252664207
LanguageEN
References cited23

In this paper we analyse Spanish verbal constructions that accept both the clitic se and the prefix auto- in order to determine whether these formations are or are not more agentive than the corresponding non-prefixed constructions ( autocriticarse vs. criticarse ). The proposal arises from the discussion about the different semantic values observed in formations with auto- and explores the distinctive features of such formations in contrast to those without auto- . We carried out a twofold analysis: first, we applied a set of tests of agentivity and control to a sample of 130 verbs with auto- extracted from the Modern Spanish Reference Corpus (CREA) and compared the sample with its non-prefixed pronominal pairs (i.e. verbs with clitic se ). Second, we carried out a series of surveys using similar tests with Spanish speakers to guarantee the acceptability of the corpus interpretations. We argue that prefixed constructions show a higher degree of agentivity and control by external arguments, which results in the impossibility of bidirectionally replacing these constructions with those that only have the clitic se

Clitic · Impossibility · Linguistics · Political science · Prefix · Computer Science · Mathematics · Natural Language Processing Techniques · Philosophy · Spanish Linguistics and Language Studies · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation · Artificial Intelligence

  • Constructionalization and Constructional Changes

    Elizabeth Closs Traugott, Graeme Trousdale•Constructionalization And…•2013

  • Constructions at Work

    Adele Goldberg, Adele Ε Goldberg•Constructions at Work•2005

  • The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar

    Thomas Hoffmann, Graeme Trousdale•The Oxford handbook of…•2013

  • Syntax

    Talmy Givón•Syntax•2001

  • Parametric versus functional explanations of syntactic universals

    Martin Haspelmath•The limits of syntactic variation•2008

  • Semantic and (morpho)syntactic constraints on anticausativization

    Open Access•Michela Cennamo, Thorhallur Eythorsson et al.•Linguistics•2015

  • Morphology, argument structure, and lexical semantics

    Open Access•Elena Feliu Arquiola•Linguistics•2003

  • Some thoughts on agentivity

    Open Access•Diana Cruse, D A Cruse•Journal of Linguistics•1973

  • Split case-marking patterns in verb-types and tense/aspect/mood

    Open Access•Tsunoda Tasaku•Linguistics•1981

  • Thematic Proto-Roles and Argument Selection

    David R Dowty, David Dowty•Language•1991

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae