Let’s Talk Stigma Out
An Interaction-Based Process of Stigma Recognition and Removal within Organizational Fields
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21465759 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Francesca Capo (0000-0002-1773-3927, University of Bergamo), Riccardo Maiolini (0000-0003-2712-7231, John Cabot University), Tommaso Ramus (0000-0002-8668-6597, École Supérieure des Sciences Économiques et Commerciales), Francesco Rullani (0000-0001-6142-856X, Ca' Foscari University of Venice, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Publication date | 2026-02-10 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Business Ethics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0167-4544 • E-ISSN: 1573-0697 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s10551-025-06228-x |
| OpenAlex | W7128535962 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 70 |
Stigma is relational and intersubjective, as it depends on how stigmatizing audiences and stigmatized actors make sense of it. However, little research has investigated the nuances of the interaction process through which stigma comes to be recognized and eventually removed. We address this puzzle by studying stigma in the field of cooperatives in the Lazio region of Italy. Following the involvement of one cooperative in illegal activities, cooperatives in the region were stigmatized by its exchange partners: nonprofit organizations and local governments. Cooperatives’ initial strategy to remove stigma led their exchange partners to change their perception of the root causes of the stigma affecting cooperatives. Cooperatives recognized this change through interaction with their exchange partners and therefore adapted their stigma-related strategy. This process successfully removed the stigma and transformed the way in which cooperatives engaged in exchanges with their partners. Building on this evidence, we develop an interaction-based process model of stigma recognition and removal that reconnects and extends the research streams on stigma and organizational fields
Business ethics · Perception · Quality of Life Research · Emotional Labor in Professions · Management and Organizational Studies · Mental Health Treatment and Access
Field or Fields? Building the Scaffolding for Cumulation of Research on Institutional Fields
Ambivalence in Organizations
The Intersection of Organizational Identity, Knowledge, and Practice
A General Theory of Organizational Stigma
Against all Odds
Conflicting Logics, Mechanisms of Diffusion, and Multilevel Dynamics in Emerging Institutional Fields
Stigmatized Categories and Public Disapproval of Organizations
Discourse, Field-Configuring Events, and Change in Organizations and Institutional Fields
“God at Work”
Inside the Hybrid Organization
Stigma Beyond Levels
Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data
Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research
Organizational Event Stigma
The Legalistic Organizational Response to Whistleblowers’ Disclosures in a Scandal
Coalitions and Public Action in the Reshaping of Corporate Responsibility
Business Versus Ethics? Thoughts on the Future of Business Ethics
The Double-edged Sword of Oppositional Category Positioning
From Foe to Friend
On Democratic Organizing and Organization Theory
Competitive Tendering In Local Government
Community and Cooperation
Two Decades of Developments in Qualitative Inquiry
The Iron Cage Revisited
Social Skill and Institutional Theory
A Theory of Scandal
The Population Ecology of Organizations
| Highly cited | No |
|---|