Practitioner Perceptions of City-Subcontracted Community Organizing
An Exploratory Study in Oklahoma City
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21476659 |
|---|---|
| Authors | C Aujean Lee (0000-0002-7592-9522), John Harris (0000-0002-4025-5775), John C Harris |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 90 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 715-727 |
| Publication date | 2024-10-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of the American Planning Association (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0194-4363 • E-ISSN: 1939-0130 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/01944363.2024.2307928 |
| OpenAlex | W4392200643 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 36 |
Problem, research strategy, and findings Planning departments use nonprofit subcontractors to increase neighborhood community organizing. However, this is the first study to assess practitioner perceptions of this subcontracting arrangement and its effect on addressing or perpetuating racial inequities in neighborhood community organizing. We used 39 interviews in an exploratory study of Oklahoma City (OK) and a nonprofit that is contracted to do neighborhood organizing. Interviewees described how the organization improved some community organizing given its detailed approach to formalize neighborhood associations. At the same time, participants believed that the subcontracting relationship and focus on formalized neighborhood associations perpetuated existing disparities in community organizing given long-standing challenges of systemic racism. The study is limited in its focus on one example but provides implications for local municipalities that contract out community development services.Takeaway for practice Nonprofits can be important partners in expanding community organizing in neighborhoods. We offer recommendations for how planners can assess and work with subcontractor community organizing nonprofits in various stages of contracts, such as co-creating metrics for success and evaluating these outcomes with the subcontractor. Planning departments can then better understand how to modify future contracts to address racial equity disparities. Planners also should understand how these organizations may highlight ongoing ineffectiveness and challenges of working with diversifying publics and existing disparities in the planning process
Business · Community development · Community organization · Community organizing · Economic growth · Economics · Exploratory research · Focus group · Perception · Political science · Public relations · Social science · Sociology · Community Health and Development · Homelessness and Social Issues · Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering · Psychology · Marketing
Unmaking Goliath
Reframing public participation
Racial Equity in Planning Organizations
The Invest in Youth Long Beach Coalition
Public participation and climate change adaptation
Saturation in qualitative research
Planning and Citizen Participation
Reframing strategic spatial planning by using a coproduction perspective
Is there a crisis of participatory planning
Distinguishing Participation and Inclusion
Outsourcing Neighborhood Planning Processes? A Case Study of a Nonprofit in the City of Oklahoma City
N of One plus Some
Façades of Equitable Development
Planning in Neighborhoods with Multiple Publics
Reframing Community Practice for the 21 St Century
Neighborhood revitalization through `collaboration
Public Deliberation in an Age of Direct Citizen Participation
Community organizing
Preparing for Democracy
Crossing Boundaries, Building Power
Who Participates in Local Government? Evidence from Meeting Minutes
Caught in the Middle
Does Government Funding Suppress Nonprofits' Political Activity
Are We Still Going Through the Empty Ritual of Participation? Inner-City Residents' and Other Grassroots Stakeholders' Perceptions of Public Input and Neighborhood Revitalization
| Highly cited | No |
|---|