Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Exploring public perceptions of generative AI and education

Topic modelling of YouTube comments in Korea

Bibliographic Data

ID21484773
AuthorsHyo-Jeong So (0000-0002-1713-9653, Ewha Womans University, corresponding author), Hyeji Jang (0000-0001-9529-1610, Ewha Womans University), Minseon Kim (Ewha Womans University), Jieun Choi (0000-0002-1989-2091, Ewha Womans University), Choi Jieun (0000-0002-5445-1910, Ewha Womans University)
Year2024
Volume44
Issue1
Pages61-80
Publication date2024-01-02
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAsia Pacific Journal of Education (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0218-8791 • E-ISSN: 1742-6855
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/02188791.2023.2294699
OpenAlexW4389856535
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited36

This study aims to investigate the public’s perceptions regarding the integration of Generative AI (GenAI) in education by analysing comments on YouTube news clips. The study collected public comments from YouTube news clips disseminated by three prominent broadcasters in South Korea between December 2022 and June 2023. Two dimensions of public perceptions were examined: sentiments and prevalent topics. Employing machine learning techniques, we conducted sentiment analysis and topic modelling on the crowdsourced dataset of 18,566 comments from 66 YouTube news clips. The first research question focused on public sentiments towards GenAI and education. Findings reveal a predominance of neutral sentiments. Rather than adopting extreme positions of complete acceptance or rejection, the public displayed an inclination to appreciate the intricate nuances of GenAI’s implications. The second research question sought to identify the main topics emerging from public comments on GenAI and education. We identified 11 distinct topics where two topics are directly linked to educational implications: demands for changes in learning and assessment methods, and the use of GenAI in higher education. Based on the key findings, we draw implications that can inform a broader understanding of public sentiment and perspective towards GenAI and education

CLIPS · Generative grammar · Perception · Political science · Public education · Public relations · Sentiment analysis · Sociology · Topic model · Computational and Text Analysis Methods · Computer Science · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Psychology · Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining · Artificial Intelligence

  • Public trust in AI

    Open Access•Ngo Thaiduong•Social Sciences & Humanities Open•2026

  • Generative AI technologies and educational outcomes

    Open Access•Ying Dong•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2026

  • Unveiling student sentiment dynamics toward AI ‐based education through statistical analysis and Monte Carlo simulation

    Open Access•Volkan Duran, Ercümend Ersanlı et al.•British Educational Research…•2025

  • A SWOT analysis of ChatGPT

    Open Access•Mohammadreza Farrokhnia, Seyyed Kazem Banihashem et al.•Innovations in Education and…•2024

  • Finding scientific topics

    Open Access•Thomas L Griffiths, Mark Steyvers•Proceedings of the National…•2004

  • “What Can ChatGPT Do?” Analyzing Early Reactions to the Innovative AI Chatbot on Twitter

    Open Access•Viriya Taecharungroj•Big Data and Cognitive Computing•2023

  • Exploring the Potential Impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on International Students in Higher Education

    Open Access•Ting Wang, Brian Lund et al.•Applied Sciences•2023

  • A density-based method for adaptive LDA model selection

    Open Access•Juan Cao, Tian Xia et al.•Neurocomputing•2009

  • How Does ChatGPT Perform on the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE)? The Implications of Large Language Models for Medical Education and Knowledge Assessment

    Open Access•Aidan Gilson, Conrad W Safranek et al.•JMIR Medical Education•2023

  • On Finding the Natural Number of Topics with Latent Dirichlet Allocation

    R Arun, V Suresh et al.•Advances in Knowledge Discovery…•2010

  • ChatGPT

    Open Access•Soha Rawas•Education and Information…•2024

  • Topicmodels

    Open Access•Bettina Grün, Kurt Hornik•Journal of Statistical Software•2011

  • Opinion Paper

    Open Access•Yogesh K Dwivedi, Nir Kshetri et al.•International Journal of…•2023

  • The Structure of Ill-Structured Solutions

    Open Access•Susan Leigh Star•Distributed Artificial Intelligence•1989

  • Impact of ChatGPT on learners in a L2 writing practicum

    Open Access•Da Yan•Education and Information…•2023

  • Generative AI and the future of education

    Open Access•Weng Marc Lim, Asanka Gunasekara et al.•The International Journal of…•2023

  • What if the devil is my guardian angel

    Open Access•Ahmed Tlili, Boulus Shehata et al.•Smart Learning Environments•2023

  • The content validity index

    Open Access•Denise F Polit, Cheryl Tatano Beck•Research in Nursing & Health•2006

  • ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education

    Open Access•Enkelejda Kasneci, Kathrin Sessler et al.•Learning and Individual Differences•2023

  • Drawing the big picture of games in education

    Open Access•Cansu C Ekin, Elif Polat et al.•Computers & Education•2023

  • Fake news

    Open Access•Giselle Rampersad, Turki Althiyabi•Journal of Information Technology…•2019

  • Applying LDA Topic Modeling in Communication Research

    Daniel Maier, Annie Waldherr et al.•Communication Methods and Measures•2018

  • Objectifying content validity

    Doris M Rubio, Marla Berg‐Weger et al.•Social Work Research•2003

  • The Agenda-Setting Function of Mass Media

    Maxwell E Mccombs, Maxwell Mccombs et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•1972

  • How to Analyze Political Attention with Minimal Assumptions and Costs

    Open Access•Kevin M Quinn, Burt L Monroe et al.•American Journal of Political…•2010

  • Boundary Crossing and Boundary Objects

    Open Access•Sanne Akkerman, Sanne F Akkerman et al.•Review of Educational Research•2011

Unique citing works3
Citations per year3
Citation span2025 - 2026 (2)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae