Exploring public perceptions of generative AI and education
Topic modelling of YouTube comments in Korea
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21484773 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Hyo-Jeong So (0000-0002-1713-9653, Ewha Womans University, corresponding author), Hyeji Jang (0000-0001-9529-1610, Ewha Womans University), Minseon Kim (Ewha Womans University), Jieun Choi (0000-0002-1989-2091, Ewha Womans University), Choi Jieun (0000-0002-5445-1910, Ewha Womans University) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 44 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 61-80 |
| Publication date | 2024-01-02 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Asia Pacific Journal of Education (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0218-8791 • E-ISSN: 1742-6855 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/02188791.2023.2294699 |
| OpenAlex | W4389856535 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 36 |
This study aims to investigate the public’s perceptions regarding the integration of Generative AI (GenAI) in education by analysing comments on YouTube news clips. The study collected public comments from YouTube news clips disseminated by three prominent broadcasters in South Korea between December 2022 and June 2023. Two dimensions of public perceptions were examined: sentiments and prevalent topics. Employing machine learning techniques, we conducted sentiment analysis and topic modelling on the crowdsourced dataset of 18,566 comments from 66 YouTube news clips. The first research question focused on public sentiments towards GenAI and education. Findings reveal a predominance of neutral sentiments. Rather than adopting extreme positions of complete acceptance or rejection, the public displayed an inclination to appreciate the intricate nuances of GenAI’s implications. The second research question sought to identify the main topics emerging from public comments on GenAI and education. We identified 11 distinct topics where two topics are directly linked to educational implications: demands for changes in learning and assessment methods, and the use of GenAI in higher education. Based on the key findings, we draw implications that can inform a broader understanding of public sentiment and perspective towards GenAI and education
CLIPS · Generative grammar · Perception · Political science · Public education · Public relations · Sentiment analysis · Sociology · Topic model · Computational and Text Analysis Methods · Computer Science · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Psychology · Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining · Artificial Intelligence
A SWOT analysis of ChatGPT
Finding scientific topics
“What Can ChatGPT Do?” Analyzing Early Reactions to the Innovative AI Chatbot on Twitter
Exploring the Potential Impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on International Students in Higher Education
A density-based method for adaptive LDA model selection
How Does ChatGPT Perform on the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE)? The Implications of Large Language Models for Medical Education and Knowledge Assessment
On Finding the Natural Number of Topics with Latent Dirichlet Allocation
ChatGPT
Topicmodels
Opinion Paper
The Structure of Ill-Structured Solutions
Impact of ChatGPT on learners in a L2 writing practicum
Generative AI and the future of education
What if the devil is my guardian angel
The content validity index
ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education
Drawing the big picture of games in education
Fake news
Applying LDA Topic Modeling in Communication Research
Objectifying content validity
The Agenda-Setting Function of Mass Media
How to Analyze Political Attention with Minimal Assumptions and Costs
Boundary Crossing and Boundary Objects
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 3 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |