Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Implementing an automated feedback program for a foreign language writing course

A learner‐centric study

Bibliographic Data

ID21499133
AuthorsMohammad Hassanzadeh (0000-0003-1510-1149, Department of English Language and Literature Vali‐e‐Asr University of Rafsanjan Rafsanjan Iran, corresponding author), Samira Fotoohnejad (Department of English Language and Literature Vali‐e‐Asr University of Rafsanjan Rafsanjan Iran, corresponding author)
Year2021
Volume37
Issue5
Pages1494-1507
Publication date2021-10-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Computer Assisted Learning (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0266-4909 • E-ISSN: 1365-2729
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/jcal.12587
OpenAlexW3189169916
LanguageEN
Citations received11
References cited27

Considering the prominence attached to written corrective feedback (WCF) within the domain of second/foreign language (L2) acquisition, automated writing evaluation (AWE) tools have steadily gained ground over the last two decades. The current study was an attempt to investigate the extent incorporating an AWE program, known as Criterion®, within a process writing framework would affect learners' writing quality in an English as a foreign language context. Moreover, we drew a comparison between the overall effects of computer‐ versus teacher‐generated WCF. Participants consisted of 53 tertiary level students from two intact essay‐writing classes. The within‐group findings revealed that the experimental group's writing scores rose significantly from the pretest to posttest after receiving automated WCF over several weeks. Significant progress was also noticed on all rounds of scores obtained from five essays assigned to this group except between the first and the second. As for the comparison between computer‐ and teacher‐administered WCF, the former condition was found to be more efficient. Overall, the findings provide a deeper insight into the workings of an automated evaluation tool and how it was employed in the L2 classroom to impart consistency to the assessment procedure and ease the burden traditionally placed upon teachers

Collaborative writing · Computer-Assisted Instruction · Corrective Feedback · Foreign language · Human–computer interaction · Linguistics · Mathematics education · Pedagogy · Second language · Second language writing · Usability · Computer Science · EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning · Psychology · Student Assessment and Feedback · Writing and Handwriting Education · Artificial Intelligence

  • A systematic review of AI-based automated written feedback research

    Open Access•Huawei Shi, Vahid Aryadoust•ReCALL•2024

  • Can algorithm-based feedback help students to write better? A meta-analysis exploring surface- and deep-level outcomes

    Open Access•Sina Scherer, Steve Graham et al.•Assessing Writing•2026

  • Compositional Analysis of Writing Instructional Practices Performed with Digital Tools

    Open Access•Paula Hernanz López, Raquel Fidalgo Redondo et al.•Educational Psychology Review•2026

  • Timed second language writing performance

    Open Access•Chian-Wen Kao, Bruce L Reynolds•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2024

  • The impact of online feedback on student learning outcomes

    Open Access•Oktay Cem Adıgüzel, Emrullah Esen et al.•Asia Pacific Education Review•2025

  • The effectiveness of automated writing evaluation in EFL/ESL writing

    Thuy Thi-Nhu Ngo, Howard Hao-Jan Chen et al.•Interactive Learning Environments•2024

  • Using automated corrective feedback tools in language learning

    Rustam Shadiev, Yingying Feng•Interactive Learning Environments•2023

  • What Are We Missing in AI‐Supported L2 Writing Research? A Systematic Review From 2014 to 2024

    Open Access•Wenqian Tang, Zhuo Wang et al.•Journal of Computer Assisted…•2026

  • The impact of automated writing evaluation on English as a foreign language learners' writing self‐efficacy, self‐regulation, anxiety, and performance

    Open Access•Elif Sari, Elif Sarı et al.•Journal of Computer Assisted…•2024

  • Still a fallible tool? Revisiting effects of automated writing evaluation from activity theory perspective

    Open Access•Rui Li•British Journal of Educational…•2023

  • Automated writing evaluation use in second language classrooms

    Open Access•Yasin Karatay, Leyla Karatay•System•2024

  • Impact of automated writing evaluation on teacher feedback, student revision, and writing improvement

    Stephanie Link, Mohaddeseh Mehrzad et al.•Computer Assisted Language Learning•2022

  • Problems in Output and the Cognitive Processes They Generate

    Merrill Swain, Sharon Lapkin•Applied Linguistics•1995

  • The Contribution of Written Corrective Feedback to Language Development

    John Bitchener, Ute Knoch•Applied Linguistics•2010

  • Computer‐mediated feedback for L2 learners

    Open Access•Akbar Bahari•Journal of Computer Assisted…•2021

  • Validity arguments for diagnostic assessment using automated writing evaluation

    Open Access•Carol A Chapelle, Elena Cotos et al.•Language Testing•2015

  • Enhancing the grammatical accuracy of EFL writing by using an AWE-assisted process approach

    Open Access•Hui-Chuan Liao•System•2016

  • Effects of Written Feedback and Revision on Learners' Accuracy in Using Two English Grammatical Structures

    Open Access•Natsuko Shintani, Rod Ellis et al.•Language Learning•2014

Citations per year3.67
Citation span2023 - 2026 (4)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae