From scientific exploitation to individual memorialization
Evolving attitudes towards research on Nazi victims’ bodies
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21504010 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Herwig Czech (0000-0001-9231-2762, Department of Ethics, Collections, and History of Medicine (Josephinum) Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria, corresponding author), Paul Weindling (0000-0003-2908-0430, Department of History, Philosophy and Culture Oxford Brookes University Oxford United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland), Christiane Druml (Department of Ethics, Collections, and History of Medicine (Josephinum) Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 35 |
| Issue | 6 |
| Pages | 508-517 |
| Publication date | 2021-07-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Bioethics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0269-9702 • E-ISSN: 1467-8519 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/bioe.12860 |
| PMID | 33748995 |
| OpenAlex | W3138771490 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 2 |
During the Third Reich, state‐sponsored violence was linked to scientific research on many levels. Prisoners were used as involuntary subjects for medical experiments, and body parts from victims were used in anatomy and neuropathology on a massive scale. In many cases, such specimens remained in scientific collections and were used until long after the war. International bioethics, for a long time, had little to say on the issue. Since the late 1980s, with a renewed interest in the Holocaust and other Nazi crimes, a consensus has increasingly taken hold that research on human tissues and body parts from the Nazi era is inadmissible, and that such specimens should be removed from scientific collections and buried. The question of what to do with scientific data obtained from these sources has not received adequate attention, however, and remains unsolved. This paper traces the history of debates about the ethical implications of using human tissue or body parts from the Nazi period for scientific purposes, primarily in the fields of anatomy and neuropathology. It also examines how this issue, from after the war until today, influenced the establishment of legal and bioethical norms on the use of human remains from morally tainted sources, with a particular emphasis on Germany and Austria. It is argued that the use of such specimens and of data derived from them is unethical not only because of potential harms to posthumous rights of the victims, but also because such use constitutes a moral harm to society at large
Bioethics · Criminology · Eugenics · Harm · Nazi Germany · Nazism · Political science · Politics · Sociology · The Holocaust · History of Medical Practice · Law · Medical History and Research · Torture, Ethics, and Law
| Citations per year | 0.2 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2021 - 2021 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |