To offer or request? Disclosing variants of uncertain significance in prenatal testing
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21504244 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Gabriel Watts (0000-0003-3421-5862, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney Health Ethics University of Sydney Sydney Australia, corresponding author), Ainsley J Newson (0000-0002-3460-772X, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney Health Ethics University of Sydney Sydney Australia) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 35 |
| Issue | 9 |
| Pages | 900-909 |
| Publication date | 2021-11-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Bioethics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0269-9702 • E-ISSN: 1467-8519 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/bioe.12932 |
| PMID | 34415629 |
| OpenAlex | W3196035986 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 1 |
The use of genomic testing in pregnancy is increasing, giving rise to questions over how the information that is generated should be offered and returned in clinical practice. While these tests provide important information for prenatal decision‐making, they can also generate information of uncertain significance. This paper critically examines three models for approaching the disclosure of variants of uncertain significance (VUS), which can arise from forms of genomic testing such as prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA). Contrary to prevailing arguments, we argue that respect for reproductive autonomy does not justify adopting a model on which an offer to disclose VUS is a routine part of genetic counselling. Instead, we contend that a commitment both to solidarity between healthcare providers and pregnant women and to the acceptance of a novel principle of caution under normative uncertainty means that we should instead adopt a model of VUS disclosure that imposes a strong presumption against offering to disclose VUS. The upshot of this is that it should be standard practice to only offer to disclose VUS when this is requested by the woman undergoing CMA. We defend our position against claims that arise from an alleged right to such information and that a presumption against an offer will lead to inequity
Autonomy · Business · Full disclosure · Genetic testing · Normative · Political science · Presumption · Computer Science · Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare · Law · Medicine · Patient Dignity and Privacy · Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics · Psychology
| Citations per year | 0.4 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2021 - 2023 (3) |
| Highly cited | No |