Korean Citizens’ Attitudes Toward Income-Based Fines

Bibliographic Data

ID21513732
AuthorsDon Soo Chon (0000-0002-8825-400X, Auburn University at Montgomery, AL, USA, corresponding author)
Year2025
Pages306624X251363250-306624X251363250
Publication date2025-08-16
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0306-624X • E-ISSN: 1552-6933
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/0306624x251363250
PMID40817775
OpenAlexW4413257932
LanguageEN
References cited16

Several European countries use income-based fines (i.e., day, unit, or structured fines). Under this system, a judge imposes a fine based on the offense’s seriousness and the offender’s income. Proponents argue that income-based fines promote equality in punishment and reduce unnecessary imprisonment resulting from fine defaults. However, opponents argue that income-based fines lead to inequality in punishment and are challenging to implement due to problems accessing an offender’s assets. Based on these arguments, this study uses the Korean Institute of Criminology and Justice survey to explore Koreans’ attitudes and factors relevant to supporting income-based fines ( n = 1,063). The findings suggest that most respondents support income-based fines, primarily because income-based fines enhance punishment equality by accounting for or incorporating one’s financial status

Actuarial science · Criminology · Default · Demographic economics · Economic inequality · Economics · Imprisonment · Inequality · Political science · Public economics · Seriousness · Sociology · Crime Patterns and Interventions · Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis · Jury Decision Making Processes · Law · Psychology · Social Psychology · Finance

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access