Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Cancer Research UK’S obesity campaign in 2018 and 2019

Effective health promotion or perpetuating the stigmatisation of obesity

Bibliographic Data

ID21513850
AuthorsNatasha Varshney (0000-0001-7566-7035, University of Liverpool, corresponding author)
Year2021
Volume47
Issue11
Pages761-765
Publication date2021-11-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Medical Ethics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0306-6800 • E-ISSN: 1473-4257
PublisherBMJ (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1136/medethics-2020-106192
PMID33239470
OpenAlexW3108815810
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited16

In 2018 and 2019 Cancer Research UK (CRUK) launched a controversial advertising campaign to inform the British public of obesity being a preventable cause of cancer. On each occasion the advertisements used were emotive and provoked frustration among the British public which was widely vocalised on social media. As well serving to educate the public of this association, the advertisements also had the secondary effect of acting as health promotion through social marketing, a form of advertising designed to influence behavioural changes. As CRUK delivered a public health message through its campaign, the advertisements should be held according to the ethical principles which underpin healthcare in the UK. This article evaluates whether the advertisements used by CRUK in 2018 and 2019 fulfilled the ethical principles of beneficence, autonomy, non-maleficence and justice. It is found that while providing an important message, the oversimplification of obesity as being the result of personal decisions ignored the complex aetiology and served to stigmatise the target demographic, potentially disengaging them from the message. Additionally, posting cancer as the consequence of obesity invokes feelings of fear due to its connotations of suffering and premature death. Based on available evidence, the use of fear in social marketing does not create sustained behavioural change. This essay recommends that CRUK discontinue its use of such strategies in its future social marketing endeavours

Advertising · Autonomy · Beneficence · Business · Economic Justice · Emotive · Health promotion · Political science · Public health · Public relations · Social marketing · Social media · Sociology · Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology · Law · Medicine · Nursing · Obesity and Health Practices · Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet · Psychology

  • Exploring Intended and Unintended Reactions to Healthy Weight and Lifestyle Advertisements

    Open Access•Michelle Jongenelis, Hannah Dixon et al.•Health Education & Behavior•2023

  • Socio-economic status over the life course and obesity

    Open Access•Suzy Newton, Dejana Braithwaite et al.•PLoS ONE•2017

  • Body Fatness and Cancer — Viewpoint of the Iarc Working Group

    Béatrice Lauby-Secretan, Béatrice Secretan et al.•New England Journal of Medicine•2016

  • Cluster-randomised trial to evaluate the ‘Change for Life’ mass media/ social marketing campaign in the UK

    Open Access•Helen Croker, Rebecca Lucas et al.•BMC Public Health•2012

  • Parent and child interactions with two contrasting anti-obesity advertising campaigns

    Open Access•Sabrina Lynette Thomas, Samantha L Thomas et al.•BMC Public Health•2014

  • An attributional analysis of reactions to stigmas

    Bernard Weiner, Raymond P Perry et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1988

  • Effects of fear-arousing communications

    Irving L Janis, Seymour Feshbach•Journal of Abnormal & Social…•1953

Citations per year0.33
Citation span2023 - 2023 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae