Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Expanded terminal sedation in end-of-life care

Bibliographic Data

ID21514014
AuthorsLaura Gilbertson (0009-0006-5962-4864, University of Oxford), Julian Savulescu (0000-0003-1691-6403, National University of Singapore, corresponding author), Justin Oakley (0000-0003-3609-0020, Monash University), Dominic Wilkinson (0000-0003-3958-8633, National University of Singapore)
Year2023
Volume49
Issue4
Pages252-260
Publication date2023-04-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Medical Ethics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0306-6800 • E-ISSN: 1473-4257
PublisherBMJ (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1136/jme-2022-108511
PMID36543531
OpenAlexW4312061423
LanguageEN
Citations received11
References cited40

Despite advances in palliative care, some patients still suffer significantly at the end of life. Terminal Sedation (TS) refers to the use of sedatives in dying patients until the point of death. The following limits are commonly applied: (1) symptoms should be refractory, (2) sedatives should be administered proportionally to symptoms and (3) the patient should be imminently dying. The term ‘Expanded TS’ (ETS) can be used to describe the use of sedation at the end of life outside one or more of these limits. In this paper, we explore and defend ETS, focusing on jurisdictions where assisted dying is lawful. We argue that ETS is morally permissible: (1) in cases of non-refractory suffering where earlier treatments are likely to fail, (2) where gradual sedation is likely to be ineffective or where unconsciousness is a clinically desirable outcome, (3) where the patient meets all criteria for assisted dying or (4) where the patient has greater than 2 weeks to live, is suffering intolerably, and sedation is considered to be the next best treatment option for their suffering. While remaining two distinct practices, there is scope for some convergence between the criteria for assisted dying and the criteria for ETS. Dying patients who are currently ineligible for TS, or even assisted dying, should not be left to suffer. ETS provides one means to bridge this gap

End-of-life care · Intensive care medicine · Palliative care · Palliative sedation · Psychiatry · Sedation · Unconsciousness · Ethics in medical practice · Medicine · Nursing · Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues · Patient Dignity and Privacy · Surgery

  • Revisión bioética acerca de la legalidad de la muerte asistida en el Ecuador

    Open Access•Andrés Felipe Mercado González, Camila Fernanda León Pineda et al.•Revista Bioética•2024

  • Bioethical review on the legality of assisted dying in Ecuador

    Open Access•Andrés Felipe Mercado González, Camila Fernanda León Pineda et al.•Revista Bioética•2024

  • Revisão bioética sobre a legalidade da morte assistida no Equador

    Open Access•Andrés Felipe Mercado González, Camila Fernanda León Pineda et al.•Revista Bioética•2024

  • Double-effect sedation

    Open Access•Hitoshi Arima•Journal of Medical Ethics•2026

  • Expanded terminal sedation

    Thomas David Riisfeldt•Journal of Medical Ethics•2023

  • Suffering, existential distress and temporality in the provision of terminal sedation

    Nathan Emmerich, Michael Chapman•Journal of Medical Ethics•2023

  • Implications of extended terminal sedation

    Paul Clay Sorum, David S Pratt•Journal of Medical Ethics•2023

  • Is intention the problem? A response to Arima’s double-effect sedation

    Muhammad Atif Waqar, Sarosh Saleem•Journal of Medical Ethics•2026

  • Expanded terminal sedation

    Guy Schofield, Idris Baker•Journal of Medical Ethics•2023

  • Expanding choice at the end of life

    Open Access•Dominic Wilkinson, Laura Gilbertson et al.•Journal of Medical Ethics•2023

  • Should Terminal Sedation Be Expanded to Individuals Who Choose to Die Via the Voluntary Stopping of Eating and Drinking

    Open Access•Laura Gilbertson, Dominic Wilkinson et al.•Bioethics•2026

  • Continuous deep sedation and the doctrine of double effect

    Open Access•Hitoshi Arima•Bioethics•2020

  • A conscious choice

    Open Access•Antony Takla, Julian Savulescu et al.•Bioethics•2021

Unique citing works11
Citations per year3.67
Citation span2023 - 2026 (4)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 8

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae