Assisted gestative technologies
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21514745 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Elizabeth Chloe Romanis (0000-0002-8774-4015, Durham University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 48 |
| Issue | 7 |
| Pages | 439-446 |
| Publication date | 2022-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Medical Ethics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0306-6800 • E-ISSN: 1473-4257 |
| Publisher | BMJ (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1136/medethics-2021-107769 |
| PMID | 35277466 |
| OpenAlex | W4221008805 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 9 |
| References cited | 59 |
A large body of literature considers the ethico-legal and regulatory issues surrounding assisted conception. Surrogacy, however, within this body of literature is an odd-fit. It involves a unique demand of another person—a form of reproductive labour—that many other aspects of assisted conception, such as gamete donation do not involve. Surrogacy is a form of assisted gestation. The potential alternatives for individuals who want a genetically related child but who do not have the capacity to gestate are ever increasing: with the advent of uterus transplantation (UTx), and the anticipated development of artificial placentas. In this paper, I highlight the pertinent conceptual differences between technologies assisting conception and those assisting gestation to demonstrate that distinct issues arise when assisted gestative technologies (AGTs) are used. I argue that there is utility in considering AGTs as a genus of technologies. These technologies perform the same function from the perspective of putative parents and might exist on a spectrum of alternatives when they become more available. Moreover, since many of the same or very similar ethical, social and legal issues are raised by surrogacy, UTx and ectogestation, analysis of these issues will be better contextualised by considering these technologies together. Many of the matters currently being highlighted for reform in the context of surrogacy will inevitably impact on how other forms of assisted gestation are governed. The conversation should be broadened; we should consider how far other emerging technologies might be accommodated in revised regulatory schemes
Assisted reproductive technology · Biology · Business · Conversation · Emerging technologies · Engineering ethics · Ethical issues · Infertility · Law and economics · Political science · Pregnancy · Public relations · Reproductive technology · Sociology · Computer Science · Engineering · Organ and Tissue Transplantation Research · Organ Donation and Transplantation · Reproductive Health and Technologies · Artificial Intelligence
Artificial placentas, pregnancy loss and loss-sensitive care
Framing gestation
Commentary on Romanis’ Assisted Gestative Technologies
Who should have access to assisted gestative technologies
Looking back and looking forward
Assisted gestative technologies, or on treating unlike cases alike
Delegating gestation or ‘assisted’ reproduction
How useful is the category of ‘assisted gestative technologies’
I Don't Really Agree With That
Procreative Beneficence
Gender, gestation and ectogenesis
Partial ectogenesis
The ‘tyranny of reproduction’
Surrogacy and uterus transplantation using live donors
Neonatal incubator or artificial womb? Distinguishing ectogestation and ectogenesis using the metaphysics of pregnancy
Feminism against Biocapitalism
Artificial Wombs and the Ectogenesis Conversation
Surrogacy and the Construction of the Maternal-Foetal Relationship
Birth registration
The Intention to be a Parent and the Making of Mothers
Fetal Images
We Are All Carrying Someone Else's Child
Gestating bodies
| Unique citing works | 9 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2,25 |
| Citation span | 2022 - 2025 (4) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 9 |