Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Assisted gestative technologies

Bibliographic Data

ID21514745
AuthorsElizabeth Chloe Romanis (0000-0002-8774-4015, Durham University, corresponding author)
Year2022
Volume48
Issue7
Pages439-446
Publication date2022-07-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Medical Ethics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0306-6800 • E-ISSN: 1473-4257
PublisherBMJ (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1136/medethics-2021-107769
PMID35277466
OpenAlexW4221008805
LanguageEN
Citations received9
References cited59

A large body of literature considers the ethico-legal and regulatory issues surrounding assisted conception. Surrogacy, however, within this body of literature is an odd-fit. It involves a unique demand of another person—a form of reproductive labour—that many other aspects of assisted conception, such as gamete donation do not involve. Surrogacy is a form of assisted gestation. The potential alternatives for individuals who want a genetically related child but who do not have the capacity to gestate are ever increasing: with the advent of uterus transplantation (UTx), and the anticipated development of artificial placentas. In this paper, I highlight the pertinent conceptual differences between technologies assisting conception and those assisting gestation to demonstrate that distinct issues arise when assisted gestative technologies (AGTs) are used. I argue that there is utility in considering AGTs as a genus of technologies. These technologies perform the same function from the perspective of putative parents and might exist on a spectrum of alternatives when they become more available. Moreover, since many of the same or very similar ethical, social and legal issues are raised by surrogacy, UTx and ectogestation, analysis of these issues will be better contextualised by considering these technologies together. Many of the matters currently being highlighted for reform in the context of surrogacy will inevitably impact on how other forms of assisted gestation are governed. The conversation should be broadened; we should consider how far other emerging technologies might be accommodated in revised regulatory schemes

Assisted reproductive technology · Biology · Business · Conversation · Emerging technologies · Engineering ethics · Ethical issues · Infertility · Law and economics · Political science · Pregnancy · Public relations · Reproductive technology · Sociology · Computer Science · Engineering · Organ and Tissue Transplantation Research · Organ Donation and Transplantation · Reproductive Health and Technologies · Artificial Intelligence

  • Artificial placentas, pregnancy loss and loss-sensitive care

    Elizabeth Chloe Romanis, Victoria Adkins•Journal of Medical Ethics•2024

  • Framing gestation

    J Y Lee•Journal of Medical Ethics•2022

  • Commentary on Romanis’ Assisted Gestative Technologies

    Evie Kendal•Journal of Medical Ethics•2022

  • Who should have access to assisted gestative technologies

    Joona Räsänen•Journal of Medical Ethics•2022

  • Looking back and looking forward

    Jennifer Blumenthal‐Barby, Jennifer Blumenthal-Barby•Journal of Medical Ethics•2022

  • Assisted gestative technologies, or on treating unlike cases alike

    Giulia Cavaliere•Journal of Medical Ethics•2022

  • Delegating gestation or ‘assisted’ reproduction

    Ezio Di Nucci•Journal of Medical Ethics•2022

  • How useful is the category of ‘assisted gestative technologies’

    Julian Koplin•Journal of Medical Ethics•2023

  • I Don't Really Agree With That

    Open Access•Srishti Hukku, L L Wynn et al.•Perspectives on Sexual and…•2025

  • Procreative Beneficence

    Open Access•Julian Savulescu•Bioethics•2001

  • Gender, gestation and ectogenesis

    Open Access•Claire Horn•Journal of Medical Ethics•2020

  • Partial ectogenesis

    Elizabeth Chloe Romanis•Journal of Medical Ethics•2020

  • The ‘tyranny of reproduction’

    Open Access•Kathryn L Mackay•Bioethics•2020

  • Surrogacy and uterus transplantation using live donors

    Open Access•Alexandra Mullock, Elizabeth Chloe Romanis et al.•Bioethics•2021

  • Neonatal incubator or artificial womb? Distinguishing ectogestation and ectogenesis using the metaphysics of pregnancy

    Open Access•Elselijn Kingma, Suki Finn•Bioethics•2020

  • Feminism against Biocapitalism

    J Oksala•Signs: Journal of Women in…•2019

  • Artificial Wombs and the Ectogenesis Conversation

    Elizabeth Chloe Romanis, Claire Horn•International Journal of Feminist…•2020

  • Surrogacy and the Construction of the Maternal-Foetal Relationship

    Open Access•Vanessa E Munro•Res Publica. Revista de Historia…•2001

  • Birth registration

    Philip Bremner•The Journal of Social Welfare Law•2020

  • The Intention to be a Parent and the Making of Mothers

    Open Access•Gillian Douglas•Modern Law Review•1994

  • Fetal Images

    Rosalind Pollack Petchesky•Feminist Studies•1987

  • We Are All Carrying Someone Else's Child

    Open Access•Zsuzsa Berend•American Anthropologist•2016

  • Gestating bodies

    Open Access•Emily Ro, Emily Ross•Sociology of Health & Illness•2019

Unique citing works9
Citations per year2,25
Citation span2022 - 2025 (4)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 9

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae