I Don't Really Agree With That
Canadians' Perspectives on the 14‐Day Rule in Relation to Artificial Womb Technology
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6444900 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Srishti Hukku (Macquarie University), L L Wynn (0000-0003-2466-8534, Macquarie University), Angel M Foster (0000-0001-8848-203X, University of Ottawa) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 57 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 104-113 |
| Publication date | 2025-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1538-6341 • E-ISSN: 1931-2393 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/psrh.70005 |
| PMID | 40044616 |
| OpenAlex | W4408244373 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 27 |
Introduction Complete ectogenesis through artificial womb technology (AWT) would enable fertilization, embryonic development, and fetal development outside of the human body. In 2004, Canada's Assisted Human Reproduction Act established a 14‐day legal limit on the in vitro cultivation of human embryos, stymying the domestic development of AWT. Given recent scientific advancements, we aimed to explore Canadians' perspectives on the 14‐day rule and AWT development. Methods In September 2020–February 2021, we conducted an online English‐French survey and semi‐structured in‐depth interviews with a subset of respondents to solicit Canadian citizens' perspectives on AWT. We audio‐recorded and transcribed the telephone/Zoom/Skype interviews and used ATLAS.ti to manage our data. We analyzed survey data using descriptive statistics and interviews for content and themes using inductive and deductive techniques. Results We received 343 completed surveys and conducted 41 interviews. Although overall knowledge of AWT, in general, and the 14‐day rule, in particular, was limited, our participants felt that AWT had the potential to improve lives. Participants also perceived the 14‐day rule as an outdated limitation on technological progress and a barrier to AWT development. Participants suggested revisiting the legislation and emphasized centering science, technology, and medicine in any update. Discussion In 2021, the International Society for Stem Cell Research released updated guidelines which recommended relaxing the 14‐day rule, depending on the research objectives. Given the changing domestic and international landscape, Canadian policymakers should revisit the 14‐day rule limit imposed by the Assisted Human Reproduction Act and seek input from Canadians when embarking on this reform process
Assisted reproductive technology · Biology · Legislation · Political science · Pregnancy · Law · Pluripotent Stem Cells Research · Psychology · Reproductive Biology and Fertility · Reproductive Health and Technologies
Memoing in qualitative research
The qualitative content analysis process
Content analysis and thematic analysis
More than an idea
Assisted gestative technologies
Neonatal incubator or artificial womb? Distinguishing ectogestation and ectogenesis using the metaphysics of pregnancy
Artificial Wombs and the Ectogenesis Conversation
Naturalistic inquiry and the saturation concept
The Tale of Assisted Human Reproduction Canada
Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis
Techniques to Identify Themes
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |