Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

I Don't Really Agree With That

Canadians' Perspectives on the 14‐Day Rule in Relation to Artificial Womb Technology

Bibliographic Data

ID6444900
AuthorsSrishti Hukku (Macquarie University), L L Wynn (0000-0003-2466-8534, Macquarie University), Angel M Foster (0000-0001-8848-203X, University of Ottawa)
Year2025
Volume57
Issue1
Pages104-113
Publication date2025-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePerspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1538-6341 • E-ISSN: 1931-2393
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/psrh.70005
PMID40044616
OpenAlexW4408244373
LanguageEN
References cited27

Introduction Complete ectogenesis through artificial womb technology (AWT) would enable fertilization, embryonic development, and fetal development outside of the human body. In 2004, Canada's Assisted Human Reproduction Act established a 14‐day legal limit on the in vitro cultivation of human embryos, stymying the domestic development of AWT. Given recent scientific advancements, we aimed to explore Canadians' perspectives on the 14‐day rule and AWT development. Methods In September 2020–February 2021, we conducted an online English‐French survey and semi‐structured in‐depth interviews with a subset of respondents to solicit Canadian citizens' perspectives on AWT. We audio‐recorded and transcribed the telephone/Zoom/Skype interviews and used ATLAS.ti to manage our data. We analyzed survey data using descriptive statistics and interviews for content and themes using inductive and deductive techniques. Results We received 343 completed surveys and conducted 41 interviews. Although overall knowledge of AWT, in general, and the 14‐day rule, in particular, was limited, our participants felt that AWT had the potential to improve lives. Participants also perceived the 14‐day rule as an outdated limitation on technological progress and a barrier to AWT development. Participants suggested revisiting the legislation and emphasized centering science, technology, and medicine in any update. Discussion In 2021, the International Society for Stem Cell Research released updated guidelines which recommended relaxing the 14‐day rule, depending on the research objectives. Given the changing domestic and international landscape, Canadian policymakers should revisit the 14‐day rule limit imposed by the Assisted Human Reproduction Act and seek input from Canadians when embarking on this reform process

Assisted reproductive technology · Biology · Legislation · Political science · Pregnancy · Law · Pluripotent Stem Cells Research · Psychology · Reproductive Biology and Fertility · Reproductive Health and Technologies

  • Memoing in qualitative research

    Open Access•Melanie Birks, Ysanne Chapman et al.•Journal of Research in Nursing•2008

  • The qualitative content analysis process

    Open Access•Satu Elo, Helvi Kyngäs•Journal of Advanced Nursing•2008

  • Content analysis and thematic analysis

    Open Access•Mojtaba Vaismoradi, Hannele Turunen et al.•Nursing & Health Sciences•2013

  • More than an idea

    Andrea Bidoli•Journal of Medical Ethics•2025

  • Assisted gestative technologies

    Elizabeth Chloe Romanis•Journal of Medical Ethics•2022

  • Neonatal incubator or artificial womb? Distinguishing ectogestation and ectogenesis using the metaphysics of pregnancy

    Open Access•Elselijn Kingma, Suki Finn•Bioethics•2020

  • Artificial Wombs and the Ectogenesis Conversation

    Elizabeth Chloe Romanis, Claire Horn•International Journal of Feminist…•2020

  • Naturalistic inquiry and the saturation concept

    Open Access•Glenn A Bowen•Qualitative Research•2008

  • The Tale of Assisted Human Reproduction Canada

    Françoise Βaylis, Jocelyn Downie•Canadian Journal of Women and the…•2013

  • Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis

    Open Access•Hsiu-Fang Hsieh, Sarah E Shannon•Qualitative Health Research•2005

  • Techniques to Identify Themes

    Open Access•Gery W Ryan, H R Bernard•CAM•2003

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae