Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Should practice and policy be revised to allow for risk-proportional payment to human challenge study participants

Bibliographic Data

ID21514923
AuthorsEuzebiusz Jamrozik (0000-0001-5940-602X, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, corresponding author), Michael J Selgelid (0000-0003-3496-2884, Australian Regenerative Medicine Institute)
Year2020
Volume46
Issue12
Pages835-836
Publication date2020-12-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Medical Ethics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0306-6800 • E-ISSN: 1473-4257
PublisherBMJ (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1136/medethics-2020-106900
PMID33154089
OpenAlexW3096493136
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited15

Human infection challenge studies (HCSs) provide illuminating case studies for several ongoing debates in research ethics, including those related to research risks and payment of participants. Grimwade et al 1 add to previous public engagement, qualitative evidence and philosophical literature on these topics.1–8 The authors advocate revision of research payment policy and practice based on their main finding that members of the public endorse ex ante payment of participants proportional to research-related risk exposure, in addition to post hoc compensation for any lasting harms that occur.1 Although ‘payment for risk’ would diverge from most current research ethics guidelines, it is noteworthy that the difference in payment to participants that their framework would allow might only be small, at least in the case of currently accepted studies. The absolute difference would likely be small because the risk of currently accepted HCS participation (after risk minimisation strategies) is usually very low.9 10 On a ‘value of statistical life’ approach, mirroring actuarial accounting for fatal risks, a 1 in 100 000 risk of death might attract an extra payment of only US$96.1 Most HCS do not involve fatality risks this high, although, on pessimistic estimates, the risk of COVID-19 HCS in young healthy adults might involve similar levels of risk.11 Such risks might arguably be justified by large expected public health benefits,12 ,9 11 13 but it remains controversial whether higher levels of payment could

Actuarial science · Business · Mirroring · Payment · Research ethics · Disaster Response and Management · Ethics in medical practice · Medicine · Psychology · Social Psychology · Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research · Finance

  • Influence of Environmental Aesthetic Value and Anticipated Emotion on Pro-Environmental Behavior

    Open Access•Huie Li, Chang You et al.•International Journal of…•2022

  • The ethical anatomy of payment for research participants

    Open Access•Joanna Różyńska•Medicine Health Care and Philosophy•2022

  • Fair go

    Olivia Grimwade, Julian Savulescu et al.•Journal of Medical Ethics•2020

  • Payment in challenge studies

    Open Access•Olivia Grimwade, Julian Savulescu et al.•Journal of Medical Ethics•2020

  • Sars-CoV-2 challenge studies

    Open Access•Susan Bull, Euzebiusz Jamrozik et al.•Journal of Medical Ethics•2021

  • Exploring Ethical Concerns About Human Challenge Studies

    Open Access•Stephanie A Kraft, Devan M Duenas et al.•Journal of Empirical Research on…•2018

Citations per year0.5
Citation span2020 - 2022 (3)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae