Who shall go first? A multicriteria approach to patient selection for first clinical trials of cardiac xenotransplantation
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21514979 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Johannes Kögel (0000-0002-2103-4643, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München), Michael Schmoeckel (0009-0005-2399-2836, LMU Klinikum), Georg Marckmann (0000-0002-6898-9500, LMU Klinikum, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 51 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 156-162 |
| Publication date | 2025-03-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Medical Ethics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0306-6800 • E-ISSN: 1473-4257 |
| Publisher | BMJ (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1136/jme-2024-110056 |
| PMID | 39244213 |
| OpenAlex | W4402334376 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 8 |
| References cited | 30 |
After achieving sustained graft functioning in animal studies, the next step in the progression of xenotransplantation towards clinical application is the initiation of the first clinical trials. This raises the question according to which criteria patients shall be selected for these trials. While the discussion regarding medical criteria has already commenced, ethical considerations must also be taken into account. This is essential, first, to establish a procedure that is ethically reasonable and justified. Second, it is a prerequisite for a publicly acceptable and comprehensible implementation. This paper outlines a multicriteria approach for the selection of patients in first-in-human clinical trials of cardiac xenotransplantation with four ethical criteria: medical need, capacity to benefit, patient choice and compliance (as an exclusion criterion). Consequently, these criteria identify a primary target group of patients who exhibit a high medical need for cardiac xenotransplantation, face a high risk of morbidity and mortality without an organ replcaement therapy, have a substantial chance of benefiting from xenotransplantation, thereby also enhancing the scientific value of the trial, and qualify for an allotransplant to have a real choice between participating in a first-in-human xenotransplantation trial and waiting for a human organ. A secondary group would include patients for whom only the first two criteria are met, that is, who have a high medical need and a good capacity to benefit from xenotransplantation but who have a restricted choice because they do not qualify for an allotransplant
Clinical trial · Intensive care medicine · Pathology · Xenotransplantation · Medicine · Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations · Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine · Xenotransplantation and immune response · Surgery · Transplantation
Xenotransplantation and the way forward
Patient choice as inclusion criterion for first clinical trials of xenotransplantation
Cardiac xenotransplantation
Reassessing the role of informed decision-making in cardiac xenotransplantation
Argument for allowing first-in-human cardiac xenotransplantation clinical trials in paediatric patients
Autonomy versus exclusion in xenotransplantation trials
A heart for everyone? The need to include diverse populations in first-in-human trials
Transparency in Biotech Governance
| Citations per year | 8 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Highly cited | No |