Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Who shall go first? A multicriteria approach to patient selection for first clinical trials of cardiac xenotransplantation

Bibliographic Data

ID21514979
AuthorsJohannes Kögel (0000-0002-2103-4643, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München), Michael Schmoeckel (0009-0005-2399-2836, LMU Klinikum), Georg Marckmann (0000-0002-6898-9500, LMU Klinikum, corresponding author)
Year2025
Volume51
Issue3
Pages156-162
Publication date2025-03-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Medical Ethics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0306-6800 • E-ISSN: 1473-4257
PublisherBMJ (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1136/jme-2024-110056
PMID39244213
OpenAlexW4402334376
LanguageEN
Citations received8
References cited30

After achieving sustained graft functioning in animal studies, the next step in the progression of xenotransplantation towards clinical application is the initiation of the first clinical trials. This raises the question according to which criteria patients shall be selected for these trials. While the discussion regarding medical criteria has already commenced, ethical considerations must also be taken into account. This is essential, first, to establish a procedure that is ethically reasonable and justified. Second, it is a prerequisite for a publicly acceptable and comprehensible implementation. This paper outlines a multicriteria approach for the selection of patients in first-in-human clinical trials of cardiac xenotransplantation with four ethical criteria: medical need, capacity to benefit, patient choice and compliance (as an exclusion criterion). Consequently, these criteria identify a primary target group of patients who exhibit a high medical need for cardiac xenotransplantation, face a high risk of morbidity and mortality without an organ replcaement therapy, have a substantial chance of benefiting from xenotransplantation, thereby also enhancing the scientific value of the trial, and qualify for an allotransplant to have a real choice between participating in a first-in-human xenotransplantation trial and waiting for a human organ. A secondary group would include patients for whom only the first two criteria are met, that is, who have a high medical need and a good capacity to benefit from xenotransplantation but who have a restricted choice because they do not qualify for an allotransplant

Clinical trial · Intensive care medicine · Pathology · Xenotransplantation · Medicine · Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations · Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine · Xenotransplantation and immune response · Surgery · Transplantation

  • Xenotransplantation and the way forward

    César Palacios-González•Journal of Medical Ethics•2025

  • Patient choice as inclusion criterion for first clinical trials of xenotransplantation

    Johannes Kögel, Michael Schmoeckel et al.•Journal of Medical Ethics•2025

  • Cardiac xenotransplantation

    Marta Szabat•Journal of Medical Ethics•2025

  • Reassessing the role of informed decision-making in cardiac xenotransplantation

    Ana Aparicio, Peyton Swanson et al.•Journal of Medical Ethics•2025

  • Argument for allowing first-in-human cardiac xenotransplantation clinical trials in paediatric patients

    Daniel J Hurst, Anthony Merlocco et al.•Journal of Medical Ethics•2025

  • Autonomy versus exclusion in xenotransplantation trials

    Richard B Gibson•Journal of Medical Ethics•2025

  • A heart for everyone? The need to include diverse populations in first-in-human trials

    Lieke van Kempen, Martine C De Vries et al.•Journal of Medical Ethics•2025

  • Transparency in Biotech Governance

    Open Access•Johannes Kögel, Georg Marckmann•NanoEthics•2026

  • Xenotransplantation Clinical Trials and Equitable Patient Selection

    Open Access•Chris Bobier, Daniel Rodger•Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare…•2024

  • Ethical analysis of the first porcine cardiac xenotransplantation

    Christopher Gyngell, Megan Munsie et al.•Journal of Medical Ethics•2024

  • The public you want, the public you get

    Open Access•Johannes Kögel•Public Understanding of Science•2024

Citations per year8
Citation span2025 - 2026 (2)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae