Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Stem cell-derived embryo models

Moral advance or moral obfuscation

Bibliographic Data

ID21515329
AuthorsChristopher Gyngell (0000-0002-1340-3947, The University of Melbourne, corresponding author), Fiona Lynch (0000-0002-6386-6739, The University of Melbourne), Tsutomu Sawai (0000-0002-3806-0573, Hiroshima University), Julian Savulescu (0000-0003-1691-6403, National University of Singapore)
Year2025
Volume51
Issue6
Pages361-364
Publication date2025-06-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Medical Ethics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0306-6800 • E-ISSN: 1473-4257
PublisherBMJ (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1136/jme-2023-109605
PMID38429089
OpenAlexW4392361553
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited26

Stem cell-derived embryo models (SCEMs) are model embryos used in scientific research to gain a better understanding of early embryonic development. The way humans develop from a single-cell zygote to a complex multicellular organism remains poorly understood. However, research looking at embryo development is difficult because of restrictions on the use of human embryos in research. Stem cell embryo models could reduce the need for human embryos, allowing us to both understand early development and improve assisted reproductive technologies. There have been several rapid advances in creating SCEMs in recent years. These advances potentially provide a new avenue to study early human development. The benefits of SCEMs are predicated on the claim that they are different from embryos and should, therefore, be exempt from existing regulations that apply to embryos (such as the 14-day rule). SCEMs are proposed as offering a model that can capture the inner workings of the embryo but lack its moral sensitivities. However, the ethical basis for making this distinction has not been clearly explained. In this current controversy, we focus on the ethical justification for treating SCEMs differently to embryos, based on considerations of moral status

Biology · Cell · Embryo · Embryogenesis · Embryonic stem cell · Engineering ethics · Environmental ethics · Multicellular organism · Stem cell · Zygote · Biomedical Ethics and Regulation · Engineering · Philosophy · Pluripotent Stem Cells Research · Renal and related cancers · Cell Biology · Genetics

  • Good bioethics and a good bioethicist

    Zoe Fritz, Brian D Earp et al.•Journal of Medical Ethics•2025

  • On the moral (in)equivalence of human embryos and stem cell-derived embryo models

    Nienke de Graeff, Lien De Proost•Journal of Medical Ethics•2025

  • Embryo models and the regulatory void

    Martí Vila-Pérez, David Lorenzo-Izquierdo et al.•Journal of Medical Ethics•2025

  • Moral equivalence and the grounds of moral status in stem cell-derived embryo models

    Johnny Sakr, Johnny M Sakr•Journal of Medical Ethics•2026

  • Is the integrated/non-integrated distinction for embryo models really obsolete

    Hafez Ismaili M’hamdi•Journal of Medical Ethics•2025

  • Rethinking Moral Status

    Steve Clarke, Hazem Zohny et al.•Rethinking Moral Status•2021

  • The time has come to extend the 14-day limit

    Sophia McCully•Journal of Medical Ethics•2021

  • Abortion and Infanticide

    Nancy Davis, Michael Tooley•The Philosophical Review•1985

  • Not birth, marriage or death, but gastrulation’

    Open Access•Nick Hopwood•The British Journal for the…•2022

Citations per year5
Citation span2025 - 2026 (2)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae