When emotions hurt
Negative interpretations of bodily signals and interoceptive difficulties in fibromyalgia
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21532958 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Aleksandra M Herman (0000-0002-3338-0543, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, corresponding author), Julia Szczawińska (Instytut Biologii Doświadczalnej im. Marcelego Nenckiego), Carolyn Berryman (0000-0002-5316-0847, University of South Australia), Tasha R Stanton (0000-0001-7106-4456, University of South Australia) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 90 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Publication date | 2026-08-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Psychological Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0340-0727 • E-ISSN: 1430-2772 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s00426-026-02341-2 |
| PMID | 42390617 |
| OpenAlex | W7167021962 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 65 |
People with fibromyalgia often demonstrate hypersensitivity to benign bodily signals and misattribute non-noxious physical signals as pain, suggesting alterations in body-brain communication and interoception. However, little is known about whether altered body-brain communication may extend to misattribution of emotion as pain. Here, using a cross-sectional design, we aimed to investigate how individuals with fibromyalgia perceive, identify, and interpret emotions and other bodily sensations, including pain, compared to healthy controls. Across two independent studies, individuals with fibromyalgia and age- and gender-matched pain-free controls completed the emBODY task, which assesses the topography of bodily sensations experienced for different states (emotional states, neutral state, pain- and physiology-related states, fatigue). Additionally, participants completed assessments of alexithymia, bodily sensation interpretation, and interoception. In both studies, linear discriminant analysis, performed to test whether different emotions and states are associated with statistically distinct bodily patterns, indicated comparable classification accuracy of body sensation maps in the fibromyalgia group and controls. However, compared with controls, the fibromyalgia group showed higher levels of alexithymia, higher awareness of bodily signals, and more negative interpretation of ambiguous bodily sensations in daily life, together with greater self-reported interoceptive difficulties. Our findings support an amplified perception of bodily signals coupled with interoceptive difficulties in people with fibromyalgia. This raises the possibility that interventions that target perceptual retraining, and re-interpretation of bodily sensations might decrease the impact of pain and promote engagement in everyday activities for people with fibromyalgia
Fibromyalgia · Interoception · Misattribution of memory · Perception · Psychological intervention · Sensation · Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research · Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation · Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Heart Beat Perception and Emotional Experience
Bodily maps of emotions
Revisions to the 2010/2011 fibromyalgia diagnostic criteria
Fear-avoidance and its consequences in chronic musculoskeletal pain
A measure of positive and negative affect for children
Knowing your own heart
Depression Anxiety Stress Scales
The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (Panas)
The twenty-item Toronto Alexithymia scale—I. Item selection and cross-validation of the factor structure
Psychometric properties of the 42-item and 21-item versions of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales in clinical groups and a community sample.
Shitsu-taikan-sho (alexisomia)
Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect
Bodily maps of emotions are culturally universal
Diminished Interoceptive Awareness in Fibromyalgia Syndrome
| Highly cited | No |
|---|