Self–other discrimination in face recognition depending on personal familiarity
Investigating a sample consisting of Japanese and Han Chinese women
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21533293 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Wenxiao Fang (0000-0002-9839-0777, Tokyo Metropolitan University), Kenta Eguchi, Takao Fukui (0000-0001-5990-642X, Tokyo Metropolitan University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 90 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Publication date | 2026-08-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Psychological Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0340-0727 • E-ISSN: 1430-2772 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s00426-026-02335-0 |
| PMID | 42406109 |
| OpenAlex | W7167480319 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 67 |
This study explored how the inclusion of others in the self during face recognition is modulated by personal familiarity, cultural background within East Asia, and autistic traits. Female Japanese and Han Chinese university students completed the Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ) questionnaire and performed a self-other discrimination task using images of their own face morphed with that of a friend or stranger of the same sex. Thresholds and widths were calculated by fitting a psychometric function to each participant's responses. In both groups, the threshold in the self-friend morphing condition was significantly lower than in the self-unknown morphing condition, and the width in the self-friend morphing condition was significantly larger than in the self-unknown morphing condition, supporting the concept of inclusion of close others in the self and indicating a blurred boundary between the self and close friends. Regarding cultural differences, Japanese participants showed a higher threshold than Chinese participants in the self-unknown condition, whereas no group difference was observed in the self-friend condition. Furthermore, multiple regression analyses revealed that social skill, a subscale of the AQ, was significantly associated with the thresholds in the self-unknown condition, but not in the self-friend condition. This study extends prior research by demonstrating that personal familiarity strongly modulates self-other discrimination in East Asian females and highlights the importance of considering individuals' autistic traits and cultural differences, even within the same cultural region, in face recognition research. STATEMENT OF PUBLIC SIGNIFICANCE: Recognizing faces is vital for social life. In Japanese and Han Chinese women, close friendships blur the self-other boundary, and the recognition of unknown faces is linked to social skills. When judging blended images made from their own face and a stranger's face, Japanese participants need more of their own facial features than Chinese participants do when deciding that the face is their own. These findings deepen our understanding of social cognition in diverse societies
Autistic traits · Chinese americans · Cultural background · Cultural diversity · Facial recognition system · Morphing · Autism Spectrum Disorder Research · Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior · Face Recognition and Perception
Culture Shapes How We Look at Faces
Confusions of Self With Close Others
The influence of culture
Representing others' actions
Large-Scale Psychological Differences Within China Explained by Rice Versus Wheat Agriculture
Shared representations between self and other
American-Japanese cultural differences in intensity ratings of facial expressions of emotion
The Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ)
Effect of subjective perspective taking during simulation of action
G*Power 3
Facial Image Manipulation
Egocentrism, allocentrism, and Asperger syndrome
Recognizing Your Hand and That of Your Romantic Partner
The neural processing of familiar and unfamiliar faces
Social and attention‐to‐detail subclusters of autistic traits differentially predict looking at eyes and face identity recognition ability
Culture and the self
Close relationships as including other in the self
Seeing you in me
| Highly cited | No |
|---|