Money counts
Effects of monetary vs. purely numerical values on the mental representation of quantities
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21533745 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Gianluca Grimalda (0000-0002-5605-5591, University of Passau), Giovanni Ottoboni (0000-0002-7649-6642, University of Bologna, corresponding author), Alessandro Cappellini (0009-0001-0070-0651, International University in Geneva), Mario Bonato (0000-0002-2004-9341, University of Padua), Mariagrazia Ranzini (0000-0001-5877-1973, University of Padua) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 89 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 85-85 |
| Publication date | 2025-04-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Psychological Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0340-0727 • E-ISSN: 1430-2772 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s00426-025-02118-z |
| PMID | 40214797 |
| OpenAlex | W4409376442 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 66 |
It has been established that humans use different cognitive models to represent and process numerical quantities. In this study, we investigated whether the representation of monetary values fundamentally differs from the representation of numbers. We also examined the influence of both socio/economic factors and mathematical ability on such representation. A group of adults (N = 272) were tested anonymously with a variant of the number-to-position task (Siegler & Opfer, 2003). They were asked to position on a horizontal line quantities expressed either in numerical format (e.g., 50) in the “Number” conditions or as monetary values (e.g., 50€) in the “Money” conditions. The extremes of the line consisted either of specific values (i.e. “2 or 2€” and “503 or 503€”) in the “Fixed” conditions or of unspecific concepts of quantity (e.g., “little” and ”a lot”) in the “Fuzzy” conditions. A linear model, as opposed to a logarithmic one, provided the best fit of group average data in all experimental conditions except for the “Money-Fuzzy” condition. The percentages of absolute error were significantly larger for Money stimuli than Number stimuli in both Fixed and Fuzzy conditions. This is consistent with the law of diminishing marginal utility, which entails that the value of monetary quantities is described by a concave curve rather than a linear relationship. As expected from previous research, participants who were more used to spending large quantities of money were closer to the linear representation model. Participants with higher mathematical abilities represented numerical values more closely to a linear model, but no such effect was found for monetary quantities
Econometrics · Economics · Logarithm · Mathematical analysis · Statistics · Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills · Mathematics · Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques · Reading and Literacy Development
Time required for Judgements of Numerical Inequality
The Ikea effect
The General Theory of Employment
Data Analysis
Log or Linear? Distinct Intuitions of the Number Scale in Western and Amazonian Indigene Cultures
Associations of non‐symbolic and symbolic numerical magnitude processing with mathematical competence
Development of Numerical Estimation in Young Children
The mental representation of parity and number magnitude.
The neural basis of the Weber–Fechner law
Is the Web as good as the lab? Comparable performance from Web and lab in cognitive/perceptual experiments
Exposition of a New Theory on the Measurement of Risk
Numeracy and Decision Making
The Development of Numerical Estimation
Preverbal and verbal counting and computation
Risk Aversion in the Small and in the Large
Interactions between number and space in parietal cortex
Risk Aversion and Expected-utility Theory
Prospect Theory
The right side of price
The value of banknotes
Numerical estimation in preschoolers
Developmental and individual differences in pure numerical estimation
Cognitive predictors of achievement growth in mathematics
Benchmark-based strategies in whole number line estimation
Penny Wise and Pound Foolish
Internationally Comparable Measures of Occupational Status for the 1988 International Standard Classification of Occupations
| Highly cited | No |
|---|