Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The paradox of inclusion

Generative AI and the center-periphery divide in language education

Bibliographic Data

ID21535684
AuthorsKaiqi Shi (0009-0008-5619-5237), Shi KaiQi (University of Hong Kong, corresponding author)
Year2026
Volume141
Pages104103
Publication date2026-08-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSystem (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0346-251X • E-ISSN: 1879-3282
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.system.2026.104103
OpenAlexW7166655654
LanguageEN
References cited50

The emergence of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) marks an infrastructural transformation in Computer-Assisted Language Learning (CALL), yet the rapid expansion of the field reveals a fundamental tension between pedagogical optimization and structural inequality. This article presents a theory-informed critical scoping review of 53 studies (2020-2026) to map the uneven landscape of GenAI in language education. Using a Center-Periphery framework, the study analyzes how GenAI functions as a pedagogical accelerator in high-resource, English-dominant contexts (“The Center”) while simultaneously marginalizing low-resource and Indigenous linguistic settings (“The Periphery”). Findings demonstrate that in the Center, GenAI enables process-oriented optimization in L2 writing and significant gains in interactional fluency through rapid feedback loops and low-stakes practice environments. In the Periphery, however, the mechanisms of data scale and statistical generalization result in structural exclusion, which manifests through degraded feedback, dialect leveling, and epistemic bias. This study conceptualizes this dual-edged force as the Paradox of Inclusion: the process by which technologies that appear to democratize access simultaneously reproduce and intensify existing global inequalities. The article concludes by arguing for a shift from purely technical innovation toward a framework of responsibility, emphasizing Indigenous Data Sovereignty and Critical AI Literacy as essential pathways toward achieving global linguistic justice in the digital age

Comprehension approach · Generative grammar · Generative model · Language acquisition · Language Understanding · Educational Leadership and Innovation · Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies · EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning

  • Collaborating with ChatGPT in argumentative writing classrooms

    Open Access•Yanfang Su, Yun Lin et al.•Assessing Writing•2023

  • Large language models in education

    Open Access•Jaeho Jeon, Seongyong Lee•Education and Information…•2023

  • Cultural bias and cultural alignment of large language models

    Open Access•Yan Tao, Olga Viberg et al.•PNAS Nexus•2024

  • To resist it or to embrace it? Examining ChatGPT’s potential to support teacher feedback in EFL writing

    Open Access•Kai Guo, Deliang Wang•Education and Information…•2024

  • Impact of automated writing evaluation on teacher feedback, student revision, and writing improvement

    Stephanie Link, Mohaddeseh Mehrzad et al.•Computer Assisted Language Learning•2022

  • ChatGPT for Language Teaching and Learning

    Open Access•Lucas Kohnke, Benjamin Luke Moorhouse et al.•RELC Journal•2023

  • Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews

    Micah D J Peters, Casey Marnie et al.•JBI Evidence Synthesis•2020

  • Scoping studies

    Open Access•Danielle Levac, Heather Colquhoun et al.•Implementation Science•2010

  • Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach

    Open Access•Zachary Munn, Micah D J Peters et al.•BMC Medical Research Methodology•2018

  • ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education

    Open Access•Enkelejda Kasneci, Kathrin Sessler et al.•Learning and Individual Differences•2023

  • Cultural Bias in Large Language Models

    Open Access•Zhaoming Liu•Journal of Transcultural…•2025

  • Effects of an AI-supported approach to peer feedback on university EFL students' feedback quality and writing ability

    Open Access•Kai Guo, Mengru Pan et al.•The Internet and Higher Education•2024

  • Translanguaging with generative AI in EFL writing

    Open Access•Wanli Yang, Chenming Lin et al.•Journal of Second Language Writing•2025

  • Generative AI (GenAI) in the language classroom

    Open Access•Seongyong Lee, Hohsung Choe et al.•Interactive Learning Environments•2026

  • Chatbots for language learning—Are they really useful? A systematic review of chatbot‐supported language learning

    Open Access•Weijiao Huang, Khe Foon Hew et al.•Journal of Computer Assisted…•2022

  • AI ‐Facilitated Article Revisions for Primary School Students With Writing Difficulties

    Open Access•Xinli Zhang, Ru Huang et al.•Journal of Computer Assisted…•2025

  • Beyond borders or building new walls

    Open Access•Hao Tran, Annita Stell•Australian Review of Applied…•2024

  • Communicating the cultural other

    Open Access•Christopher J Jenks•Applied Linguistics Review•2025

  • Designing ChatGPT-mediated feedback activities in EFL writing

    Open Access•Yunxiao Zhang, Yongcan Liu•Assessment & Evaluation in Higher…•2026

  • Call—past, present and future

    Open Access•Stephen Bax•System•2003

  • Developing L2 turn-taking with ChatGPT

    Open Access•Min Gyeong Choi, Sun-Young Oh•System•2025

  • The effects of generative AI on initial language teacher education

    Open Access•Benjamin Luke Moorhouse, Lucas Kohnke•System•2024

  • Computers and language learning

    Open Access•Mark Warschauer, Deborah Healey•Language Teaching•1998

  • Do Interactions with ChatGPT Influence L2 Learners' Oral Speaking Ability, Summarization Ability, and Perceptions of Generative AI Tasks

    Open Access•Sarah Sok, Hye Won Shin•TESOL Quarterly•2025

  • Scoping studies

    Hilary Arksey, Lisa O’malley•International Journal of Social…•2005

  • Generative AI has a language problem

    Open Access•Mita Choudhury, Margalida Pons Morell•Nature Human Behaviour•2023

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae