The paradox of inclusion
Generative AI and the center-periphery divide in language education
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21535684 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Kaiqi Shi (0009-0008-5619-5237), Shi KaiQi (University of Hong Kong, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 141 |
| Pages | 104103 |
| Publication date | 2026-08-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | System (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0346-251X • E-ISSN: 1879-3282 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.system.2026.104103 |
| OpenAlex | W7166655654 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 50 |
The emergence of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) marks an infrastructural transformation in Computer-Assisted Language Learning (CALL), yet the rapid expansion of the field reveals a fundamental tension between pedagogical optimization and structural inequality. This article presents a theory-informed critical scoping review of 53 studies (2020-2026) to map the uneven landscape of GenAI in language education. Using a Center-Periphery framework, the study analyzes how GenAI functions as a pedagogical accelerator in high-resource, English-dominant contexts (“The Center”) while simultaneously marginalizing low-resource and Indigenous linguistic settings (“The Periphery”). Findings demonstrate that in the Center, GenAI enables process-oriented optimization in L2 writing and significant gains in interactional fluency through rapid feedback loops and low-stakes practice environments. In the Periphery, however, the mechanisms of data scale and statistical generalization result in structural exclusion, which manifests through degraded feedback, dialect leveling, and epistemic bias. This study conceptualizes this dual-edged force as the Paradox of Inclusion: the process by which technologies that appear to democratize access simultaneously reproduce and intensify existing global inequalities. The article concludes by arguing for a shift from purely technical innovation toward a framework of responsibility, emphasizing Indigenous Data Sovereignty and Critical AI Literacy as essential pathways toward achieving global linguistic justice in the digital age
Comprehension approach · Generative grammar · Generative model · Language acquisition · Language Understanding · Educational Leadership and Innovation · Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies · EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Collaborating with ChatGPT in argumentative writing classrooms
Large language models in education
Cultural bias and cultural alignment of large language models
To resist it or to embrace it? Examining ChatGPT’s potential to support teacher feedback in EFL writing
Impact of automated writing evaluation on teacher feedback, student revision, and writing improvement
ChatGPT for Language Teaching and Learning
Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews
Scoping studies
Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach
ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education
Cultural Bias in Large Language Models
Effects of an AI-supported approach to peer feedback on university EFL students' feedback quality and writing ability
Translanguaging with generative AI in EFL writing
Generative AI (GenAI) in the language classroom
Chatbots for language learning—Are they really useful? A systematic review of chatbot‐supported language learning
AI ‐Facilitated Article Revisions for Primary School Students With Writing Difficulties
Beyond borders or building new walls
Communicating the cultural other
Designing ChatGPT-mediated feedback activities in EFL writing
Call—past, present and future
Developing L2 turn-taking with ChatGPT
The effects of generative AI on initial language teacher education
Computers and language learning
Do Interactions with ChatGPT Influence L2 Learners' Oral Speaking Ability, Summarization Ability, and Perceptions of Generative AI Tasks
Scoping studies
Generative AI has a language problem
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |